Our amended and restated bylaws also establish an advance notice procedure for stockholders who wish to present a proposal before an annual meeting of stockholders but do not intend for the proposal to be included in our proxy statement. Our amended and restated bylaws provide that the only business that may be conducted at an annual meeting of stockholders is business that is (i) specified in our proxy materials with respect to such meeting, (ii) otherwise properly brought before such meeting by or at the direction of our board of directors, or (iii) properly brought before such meeting by a stockholder of record entitled to vote at the annual meeting who has delivered timely written notice to our Secretary, which notice must contain the information specified in our amended and restated bylaws. To be timely for our 20202022 annual meeting of stockholders, our Secretary must receive the written notice at our principal executive offices:
If a stockholder who has notified us of his, her or its intention to present a proposal at an annual meeting does not appear to present his, her or its proposal at such annual meeting, we are not required to present the proposal for a vote at such annual meeting.
You may propose director candidates for consideration by our nominating and corporate governance committee. Any such recommendations should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for membership on our board of directors and should be directed to our Secretary at the address set forth above. For additional information regarding stockholder recommendations for director candidates, see “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance—Stockholder Recommendations for Nominations to the Board of Directors.”
In addition, our amended and restated bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors for election at an annual meeting of stockholders. To nominate a director, the stockholder must provide the information required by our amended and restated bylaws. In addition, the stockholder must give timely notice to our Secretary in accordance with our amended and restated bylaws, which, in general, require that the notice be received by our Secretary within the time periods described above under “Stockholder Proposals” for stockholder proposals that are not intended to be included in a proxy statement.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Our business affairs are managed under the direction of our board of directors, which is currently composed of eightnine members. Six of our directors are independent within the meaning of the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market ("Nasdaq"(“Nasdaq”). Our board of directors is divided into three staggered classes of directors. At each annual meeting of stockholders, a class of directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the same class whose term is then expiring.
Steven Vassallo, one of our current Class I directors, informed us on March 26, 2019, that he does not intend to stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting. Effective upon the Annual Meeting, the authorized size of our board of directors will be decreased to seven members. We thank Mr. Vassallo for his service to our company and board of directors.
The following table sets forth the names, ages as of April 18, 2019,21, 2021, and certain other information for each of the directors with terms expiring at the Annual Meeting (who are also nominees for election as a director at the Annual Meeting), each new director nominee, and for each of the continuing members of our board of directors,directors. Ms. Ellen Smith will not stand for reelection when her current term expires on the date of the Annual Meeting. Ms. Sonita Lontoh is a new director nominee and Mr. Vassallo:was recommended by a third-party search firm.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class | | Age | | Position | | Director Since | | Current Term Expires | | Expiration of Term For Which Nominated |
Directors with Terms Expiring at the Annual Meeting/Nominees | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Alan Ferber (1) | | I | | 51 | | Director | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2021 |
Lynn Jurich | | I | | 39 | | Chief Executive Officer and Director | | 2007 | | 2019 | | 2021 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Continuing Directors | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Leslie Dach (1) | | II | | 64 | | Director | | 2016 | | 2020 | | — |
Edward Fenster | | II | | 42 | | Chairman and Director | | 2007 | | 2020 | | — |
Mary Powell (2) | | II | | 58 | | Director | | 2018 | | 2020 | | — |
Katherine August-deWilde (2) (3) | | III | | 71 | | Director | | 2016 | | 2021 | | — |
Gerald Risk (3) | | III | | 50 | | Director | | 2014 | | 2021 | | — |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-Continuing Director | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Steven Vassallo (2) (3) | | I | | 47 | | Director | | 2009 | | 2019 | | — |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class | | Age | | Position | | Director Since | | Current Term Expires | | Expiration of Term For Which Nominated |
Directors with Terms Expiring at the Annual Meeting/Nominees | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Katherine August-deWilde (1) (2) | | III | | 73 | | Director | | 2016 | | 2021 | | 2024 |
Sonita Lontoh | | III | | 45 | | Director | | — | | — | | 2024 |
Gerald Risk (3) (4) | | III | | 52 | | Director | | 2014 | | 2021 | | 2024 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Continuing Directors | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn Jurich | | I | | 41 | | Chief Executive Officer and Director | | 2007 | | 2022 | | — |
Alan Ferber (1) (2) | | I | | 53 | | Director | | 2018 | | 2022 | | — |
David Bywater | | I | | 51 | | Advisor and Director | | 2020 | | 2022 | | — |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Leslie Dach (1) (3) | | II | | 67 | | Director | | 2016 | | 2023 | | — |
Edward Fenster | | II | | 44 | | Executive Chairman and Director | | 2007 | | 2023 | | — |
Mary Powell (2) (3) | | II | | 60 | | Director | | 2018 | | 2023 | | — |
______________________
| |
(1) | (1) Member of our nominating and corporate governance committee |
| |
(2) | Member of our compensation committee |
| |
(3) | Member of our audit committee |
(2) Member of our compensation committee (3) Member of our audit committee
(4) Lead Independent Director
Nominees for Director
Lynn JurichKatherine August-deWilde. Ms. Jurich is one of our co-founders andAugust-deWilde has served as our Chief Executive Officer since March 2014 and as a member of our board of directors since inception.January 2016. Ms. JurichAugust-deWilde is currently the Vice Chair of First Republic Bank (NYSE: FRC), a position she has held since the beginning of 2016, and has served on the board of directors since 1988. First Republic Bank offers private personal banking, private business banking, and private wealth management services. Ms. August-deWilde has held several executive leadership roles at the company, including COO from 1993 to 2014, and President from 2007 to 2015. Previously, Ms. August-deWilde was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at PMI Group. Ms. August-deWilde currently serves on the board of directors of Eventbrite Inc. (NYSE: EB), a self-service ticketing and registration company, and TriNet Group Inc. (NYSE: TNET), a human resource software solutions company for businesses, as well as a number of privately held companies. She holds a B.A. degree from Goucher College and an M.B.A. from Stanford Graduate School of Business.
Ms. August-deWilde was selected to serve on our board of directors because of her extensive executive and risk management experience, as well as her experience in the consumer-facing financial industry.
Sonita Lontoh. Ms. Lontoh is a nominee for our board of directors. Since April 2018, Ms. Lontoh has served as our Co-Chief Executive Officer from October 2012 to March 2014, our President from January 2009 to October 2012,the Global Head of Marketing of the Personalization, 3D Printing and our ExecutiveDigital Manufacturing business of HP Inc., a leading global provider of personal computing, imaging and printing products, and related technologies, solutions and services. Ms. Lontoh previously served as Vice President of SalesStrategic Marketing, Digital Grid NA at Siemens AG, a global technology company focusing on automation, digitalization, intelligent infrastructure, distributed energy systems, and Marketingsmart mobility solutions, from 2007February 2016 to January 2009. From July 2002 to July 2005,April 2018. Previously, Ms. JurichLontoh served as the Director of Marketing of Trilliant, a global provider of industrial IoT solutions enabling smart grid, smart cities, smart lighting, smart metering and distributed energy integration, from February 2011 to February 2016. Earlier in her career, Ms. Lontoh served at PG&E, one of the largest energy utility companies in the United States. Ms. Lontoh currently serves on the board of advisors of the Jacobs Institute for Design Innovation at the University of California, Berkeley. She earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research from the University of California Berkeley, a Master of Engineering in Logistics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and an associateM.B.A. with a focus on strategy and marketing from Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management.
Ms. Lontoh was selected to serve on our board of directors because of her extensive experience and knowledge of marketing, the energy industry, customer experiences, and digital transformations.
Gerald Risk. Mr. Risk has served as a member of our board of directors since February 2014. Since March 2013, Mr. Risk has served as Vice Chairman at Summit Partners,Asurion, LLC, a private equity firm. Ms. Jurichprovider of device insurance, warranty & support services for cell phones, consumer electronics & home appliances. He previously served in other leadership roles at Asurion, including as its President from May 2009 to March 2013 and its Chief Financial Officer from February 1999 to May 2009, where his responsibilities included oversight of risk management. Mr. Risk currently serves on the boards of directors of a number of privately held companies. Mr. Risk holds a B.S. in Science, Technology, and SocietyBachelor of Commerce from StanfordQueen’s University and an M.B.A. from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.
Ms. Jurich was selected to serve on our board of directors because of the perspective and experience she brings as one of our co-founders and as one of our largest stockholders.
Alan Ferber. Mr. Ferber has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Jackson Hewitt Tax Services, a provider of tax preparation services, since January 2017. Prior to joining Jackson Hewitt, Mr. Ferber was President of ADT Residential, a home security company, from 2013 until 2016. He also previously held the role of Senior Vice President and Chief Customer Officer for ADT. His other experience includes holding several executive leadership positions at US Cellular, a telecommunications company, from 2001 until 2012 including serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Chief Strategy and Brand Officer. Mr. Ferber received a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics from the University of Michigan, and an MBA with a concentration in finance and marketing from Northwestern University’s Kellogg Graduate School of Management.
Mr. FerberRisk was selected to serve on our board of directors because of his extensive executive and risk management experience, as well as his experience as an operator and knowledge of consumer-facing industries.investor building emerging growth businesses.
Continuing Directors
Edward FensterLynn Jurich. Mr. FensterMs. Jurich is one of our co-founders and has served as our ChairmanChief Executive Officer since March 2014 and as a member of our board of directors since inception. Mr. FensterMs. Jurich served as our Chief Executive Officer from June 2008 to October 2012, and our Co-Chief Executive Officer from October 2012 to March 2014.2014, our President from January 2009 to October 2012, and our Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing from 2007 to January 2009. From May 2003July 2002 to JuneJuly 2005, Mr. FensterMs. Jurich served as Director of Corporate Developmentan associate at Asurion, LLC, a technology device protection and support company. From July 1999 to May 2003, Mr. Fenster worked at The Blackstone Group,Summit Partners, a private equity firm. Mr. FensterMs. Jurich serves on the board of directors of privately held Generate Capital, Inc. Ms. Jurich holds a B.A.B.S. in EconomicsScience, Technology, and Society from Johns HopkinsStanford University and an M.B.A. from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.
Mr. FensterMs. Jurich was selected to serve on our board of directors because of the perspective and experience heshe brings as one of our co-founders and as one of our largest stockholders.
Alan Ferber. Mr. Ferber has served as a member of our board of directors since February 2018. He served as the Chief Executive Officer of Jackson Hewitt Tax Services, a provider of tax preparation services, from January 2017 until July 2020 and continues to serve as a member of its board of directors. Prior to joining Jackson Hewitt, Mr. Ferber was President of ADT Residential, a home security company, from 2013 until 2016. He also previously held the role of Senior Vice President and Chief Customer Officer for ADT. His other experience includes holding several executive leadership positions at US Cellular, a telecommunications company, from 2001 until 2012 including serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Chief Strategy and Brand Officer. Mr. Ferber also serves on the board of directors of Alert 360, a privately held alarm-monitoring and security company. Mr. Ferber received a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics from the University of Michigan, and an M.B.A. with a concentration in finance and marketing from Northwestern University’s Kellogg Graduate School of Management.
Mr. Ferber was selected to serve on our board of directors because of his experience and knowledge of consumer-facing industries.
David Bywater. Mr. Bywater has served as a member of our board of directors since October 2020 and as an Advisor since April 2021. He served as the Chief Executive Officer of Vivint Solar, Inc. from December 2016 to April 2021. Mr. Bywater also served as Vivint Solar’s interim President and Chief Executive Officer from May 2016 until his appointment as permanent Chief Executive Officer in December of 2016. Prior to joining Vivint Solar, Mr. Bywater served as the Chief Operating Officer of Vivint, Inc. Prior to that, Mr. Bywater served as Executive Vice President and Corporate Officer for Xerox Corporation, and was the Chief Operating Officer of its State Government Services from 2010 to July 2013. From 2003 to 2010, Mr. Bywater worked at Affiliated Computer Services. From 1999 to 2003, Mr. Bywater was a senior manager at Bain & Company. Mr. Bywater holds a B.S. in economics from Brigham Young University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.
Mr. Bywater was selected to serve on our board of directors because of his experience leading a residential solar company and his extensive business experience.
Leslie Dach. Mr. Dach has served as a member of our board of directors since May 2016. Mr. Dach brings more than 25 years of experience running major business and strategic initiatives across the public,public, private and civil sectors, including leading corporate affairs and sustainability at Walmart Stores Inc. from 2006 to 2013. Mr. Dach served as senior counselor to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services from 2014 to 2016. Prior to that, Mr. Dach served as executive vice president of corporate affairs for Walmart and was a member of the company’s executive council and executive finance committee. Mr. Dach has served on numerous boards including the Environmental Defense Fund, World Resources Institute, United Negro College Fund, the Yale University Council and the National Audubon Society. He previously served on our board of directors from June 2013 to July 2014. Mr. Dach holds a B.S. in Biology from Yale University and an M.P.A. from Harvard University.
Mr. Dach was selected to serve on our board of directors because of his extensive business experience in both the public and private sector and his prior experience with the Company.
Mary PowellEdward Fenster. Ms. PowellMr. Fenster is one of our co-founders and has served as the Presidentour Executive Chairman since March 2014 and Chief Executive Officer of Green Mountain Power, an electric services company that serves residential and business customers in Vermont since 2008. Her previous roles at Green Mountain Power Corporation include Senior Vice President and Chief Operations Officer from 2001-2008, and Senior Vice President, Customer and Organizational Development from 1999-2001. Ms. Powell holds an Associate's degree from Keene State College.
Ms. Powell was selected to serve on our board of directors because of her extensive experience and knowledge of the energy and utility industry.
Gerald Risk. Mr. Risk has served as a member of our board of directors since February 2014. Since March 2013,inception. Mr. Risk hasFenster served as Vice Chairmanour Chief Executive Officer from June 2008 to October 2012, and our Co-Chief Executive Officer from October 2012 to March 2014. From May 2003 to June 2005, Mr. Fenster served as Director of Corporate Development at Asurion, LLC, a company that providesprovider of device detection andinsurance, warranty & support services and previously served as its President from May 2009 to March 2013 and its Chief Financial Officer from Februaryfor cell phones, consumer electronics & home appliances. From July 1999 to May 2009.2003, Mr. Risk currently serves on the boards of directors ofFenster worked at The Blackstone Group, a number of privately held companies.private equity firm. Mr. RiskFenster holds a Bachelor of CommerceB.A. in economics from Queen’sJohns Hopkins University and an M.B.A. from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.
Mr. RiskFenster was selected to serve on our board of directors because of his extensive executivethe perspective and experience he brings as one of our co-founders and his experience as an operator and investor building emerging growth businesses.one of our largest stockholders.
Katherine August-deWilde.Mary Powell. Ms. August-deWildePowell has served as a member of our board of directors since January 2016. Ms. August-deWilde is currentlyFebruary 2018. She served as the Vice ChairPresident and Chief Executive Officer of First Republic Bank (NYSE: FRC), a position she has held sinceGreen Mountain Power Corporation, an electric services company that serves 75% of the beginningState of 2016,Vermont’s residential and has served on the board of directors since 1988. First Republic Bank offers private personal banking, private business banking, and private wealth management services. Ms. August-deWilde has held several executive leadershipcustomers, from 2008 to 2019. Her previous roles at the company, including COO from 1993 - 2014, and President from 2007 - 2015. Previously, Ms. August-deWilde wasGreen Mountain Power Corporation included Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOperations Officer at PMI Group.from 2001 to 2008, and Senior Vice President, Customer and Organizational Development from 1999 to 2001. Ms. August-deWildePowell has been nationally recognized for her work transforming the energy system by outlets including Fast Company magazine and has received numerous industry awards, most recently being named Utility Dive’s 2019 “Executive of the Year” in recognition for her leadership of Vermont’s investor-owned utility to prioritize and deliver on customer-choice distributed energy solutions. Ms. Powell currently serves on the board of directors of EventbriteHawaiian Electric Industries Inc. (NYSE: EB)HE), the largest utility in Hawaii, CGI Inc. (NYSE:GIB), a self-service ticketingglobal IT and registration company,business consulting services firm, and TriNet Group Inc.Climate Change Crisis Real Impact I Acquisition Corporation (NYSE: TNET)CLII), a human resource software solutions company for businesses, as well asspecial-purpose acquisition corporation. She also serves on the boards of a number of other privately held companies. Shecompanies and nonprofits. Ms. Powell holds a B.A.an Associate’s degree from Goucher College and an M.B.A. from Stanford Graduate School of Business.Keene State College.
Ms. August-deWildePowell was selected to serve on our board of directors because of her extensive experience inand knowledge of the consumer facing financialenergy and utility industry.
Non-Continuing Director
Steven Vassallo. Mr. Vassallo has served as a member of our board of directors since October 2009 and previously served as a member of our board of directors from June 2008 to July 2009. Since October 2007, Mr. Vassallo has served as a General Partner at Foundation Capital, a venture capital firm. Mr. Vassallo currently serves on the boards of directors of several privately held companies. Mr. Vassallo holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute and an M.B.A. from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.
Mr. Vassallo was selected to serve on our board of directors because of his extensive experience as an investor building emerging growth companies.
Director Independence
Our common stock is listed on Nasdaq. Under the listing standards of Nasdaq, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s board of directors, as affirmatively determined by the board of directors. In addition, the Nasdaq listing standards require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation, and nominating and corporate governance committees be independent. Under the Nasdaq listing standards, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of that listed company’s board of directors, that director does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.
Audit committee members must also satisfy the additional independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the Nasdaq listing standards. Compensation committee members must also satisfy the additional independence criteria set forth in Rule 10C-1 under the Exchange Act and the Nasdaq.
Our board of directors has undertaken a review of the independence of each of our directors.directors and our director nominee. Based on information provided by each director and director nominee concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, our board of directors has determined that directors Katherine August-deWilde, Leslie Dach, Alan Ferber, Mary Powell, Ellen Smith, and Gerald Risk, and director nominee Sonita Lontoh, do not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors or director nominee is “independent” as that term is defined under the Nasdaq listing standards. In making these determinations, our board of directors considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director and director nominee has with the Company and all other facts and circumstances our board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director.director and director nominee.
Board Leadership Structure and Lead Independent Director
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that if we do not have an independent chairperson then we will appoint a lead independent director. Mr. Fenster currently serves as an executive and Executive Chairman of our board of directors. Our board of directors believes that it can benefit from Mr. Fenster’s years of experience as a founder and executive of the Company. Mr. Fenster possesses detailed in-depth knowledge of the issues, opportunities, and challenges facing us.
Our board of directors appointed Mr. Vassallo is currentlyRisk as the Lead Independent Director of our board of directors.directors on June 7, 2019. Our board of directors believes that the current board leadership structure, with a strong emphasis on board independence, allows our management team to focus on our day-to-day business while allowing the Lead Independent Director to lead our board of directors in its fundamental role of providing independent advice to and oversight of management. In addition, as described below, our board has three standing committees, each member of which is an independent director. Our board delegates substantial responsibility to each committee of the board, which reports their activities and actions back to the full board. We believe that the independent committees of our board are an important aspect of the leadership structure of our board. In connection with Mr. Vassallo’s intention to not stand for re-election to the board of directors, the board of directors will appoint another independent director to serve as the Lead Independent Director after the Annual Meeting.
Board Meetings and Committees
During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2020, our board of directors held fourten meetings (including regularly scheduled and special meetings), and. During fiscal year 2020, each directorof our directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of our board of directors held during the period for which he or she has been a directorBoard and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of our board of directors on which he or she served during the periods that he or she served.as a member.
Although we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of our board of directors at annual meetings of stockholders, we strongly encourage our directors to attend. Seven of theAll then-serving members of our board of directors attended our 20182020 annual meeting of stockholders.
Our board of directors has established an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee. The composition and responsibilities of each of the three committees of our board of directors is described below. Members will serve on these committees until their resignation or until as otherwise determined by our board of directors.
Audit Committee
Our audit committee consists of Messrs. VassalloMr. Risk, Ms. Powell and Risk and Ms. August-deWilde,Mr. Dach, with Mr. Risk serving as the chair. Each member of our audit committee meets the requirements for independence and financial literacy for audit committee members under the Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules and regulations. In addition, our board of directors has determined that Mr. Risk and Ms. August-deWilde are eachis an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of Item 407(d) of Regulation S‑KS-K under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Mr. Vassallo is not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting and will no longer serve on the audit committee following the Annual Meeting. Our audit committee is responsible for, among other things:
•selecting a qualified firm to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements;
•helping to ensure the independence and performance of the independent registered public accounting firm;
•discussing the scope and results of the audit with the independent registered public accounting firm, and reviewing, with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, our interim and year-end results of operations;
•developing procedures for employees to submit concerns anonymously about questionable accounting or audit matters;
•evaluating the performance of our internal audit function;
•reviewing our policies on risk assessment and risk management;
•reviewing related party transactions; and
•approving or, as required, pre-approving, all audit and all permissible non-audit services, other than de minimis non-audit services, to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm.
Our audit committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the Nasdaq listing standards. A copy of the charter of our audit committee is available on our website at www.sunrun.com on the “Governance Documents” page under the “Investors – CorporateLeadership & Governance”. section. During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2020, our audit committee held sevenfive meetings.
Compensation Committee
Our compensation committee consists of Mses. August-deWilde and Powell and Mr. Vassallo,Ferber, with Ms. August-deWilde serving as the chair.
Each member of our compensation committee meets the requirements for independence for compensation committee members under the Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules and regulations, including Rule 10C-1 under the Exchange Act. Each member of our compensation committee is also a non-employee director, as defined pursuant to Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and an outside director, as defined pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). Mr. Vassallo is not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting and will no longer serve on the compensation committee following the Annual Meeting. Our compensation committee is responsible for, among other things:
•reviewing, approving and determining, or making recommendations to our board of directors regarding, the compensation of our executive officers;
•administering our equity compensation plans;
•reviewing, approving and making recommendations to our board of directors regarding incentive compensation and equity compensation plans;
•evaluating director compensation and making recommendations to our board of directors regarding the compensation of our directors; and
•establishing and reviewing general policies relating to compensation and benefits of our employees.
Our compensation committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the Nasdaq listing standards. A copy of the charter of our compensation committee is available on our website at www.sunrun.com on the “Governance Documents” page under the “Investors – CorporateLeadership & Governance”. section. During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2020, our compensation committee held fivesix meetings.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Our nominating and corporate governance committee consists of Ms. August-deWilde and Messrs. Ferber and Dach, with Mr. Dach serving as the chair.
Each member of our nominating and corporate governance committee meets the requirements for independence under the Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules and regulations. Our nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for, among other things:
•identifying, evaluating and selecting, or making recommendations to our board of directors regarding, nominees for election to our board of directors and its committees;
•evaluating the performance of our board of directors and of individual directors;
•considering and making recommendations to our board of directors regarding the composition of our board of directors and its committees;
•reviewing developments in corporate governance practices;
•evaluating the adequacy of our corporate governance practices and reporting; and
•developing and making recommendations to our board of directors regarding corporate governance guidelines and matters.matters; and
•reviewing our strategies, activities, policies, and communications regarding environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) related matters.
Our nominating and corporate governance committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable Nasdaq listing standards o.standards. A copy of the charter of our nominating and corporate governance committee is available on our website at www.sunrun.com on the “Governance Documents” page under “Investorsthe “Investor Relations – CorporateLeadership & Governance”. section. During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2020, our nominating and corporate governance committee held twofour meetings.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During the last fiscal year, Mses. August-deWilde and Powell and Messrs. Vassallo and WongMr. Ferber served as members of our compensation committee. Ms. Powell joined the compensation committee on February 1, 2018, and Mr. Wong resigned from our board of directors effective March 1, 2018. None of the members of our compensation committee is or has been an officer or employee of our company. None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of any entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving on our board of directors or compensation committee.
Considerations in Evaluating Director Nominees
Our nominating and corporate governance committee uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating director nominees. In its evaluation of director candidates, our nominating and corporate governance committee will consider the current size and composition of our board of directors and the needs of our board of directors and the respective committees of our board of directors. Some of the qualifications that our nominating and corporate governance committee considers include, without limitation, issues of character, integrity, judgment, diversity, independence, area of expertise, corporate experience, length of service, potential conflicts of interest and other commitments. Nominees must also have the ability to offer advice and guidance to our Chief Executive Officer based on past experience in positions with a high degree of responsibility and be leaders in the companies or institutions with which they are affiliated. Director candidates must have sufficient time available in the judgment of our nominating and corporate governance committee to perform all board of director and committee responsibilities. Members of our board of directors are expected to prepare for, attend, and participate in all board of director and applicable committee meetings. Other than the foregoing, there are no stated minimum criteria for director nominees, although our nominating and corporate governance committee may also consider such other factors as it may deem, from time to time, are in our and our stockholders’ best interests.
Although our board of directors does not maintain a specific policy with respect to board diversity, our board of directors believes that our board of directors should be a diverse body, and our nominating and corporate governance committee considers a broad range of backgrounds and experiences. In making determinations regarding nominations of directors, our nominating and corporate governance committee may take into account the benefits of diverse viewpoints. Our nominating and corporate governance committee also considers these and other factors as it oversees the annual board of director and committee evaluations. After completing its review and evaluation of director candidates, our nominating and corporate governance committee recommends to our full board of directors the director nominees for selection.
With the election of the Class III director nominees, Sunrun's board will be in compliance with the requirements of California Assembly Bill No. 979 that become effective as of December 31, 2021. Stockholder Recommendations for Nominations to the Board of Directors
Our nominating and corporate governance committee will consider candidates for director recommended by stockholders holding at least one percent (1%) of the fully diluted capitalization of our company continuously for at least twelve (12) months prior to the date of the submission of the recommendation, so long as such recommendations comply with our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and applicable laws, rules and regulations, including those promulgated by the SEC. Our nominating and corporate governance committee will evaluate such recommendations in accordance with its charter, our amended and restated bylaws, our policies and procedures for director candidates, as well as the regular director nominee criteria described above.
This process is designed to ensure that our board of directors includes members with diverse backgrounds, skills and experience, including appropriate financial and other expertise relevant to our business. Eligible stockholders wishing to recommend a candidate for nomination should contact our General Counsel or our Legal Department in writing. Such recommendations must include information about the candidate, a statement of support by the recommending stockholder, evidence of the recommending stockholder’s ownership of our common stock and a signed letter from the candidate confirming willingness to serve on our board of directors. Our nominating and corporate governance committee has discretion to decide which individuals to recommend for nomination as directors.
Any nomination must comply with the requirements set forth in our bylaws and should be sent in writing to our Secretary at Sunrun Inc., 595 Market225 Bush Street, 29th Floor,Suite 1400, San Francisco, CA 94105.94104. To be timely for our 20202022 annual meeting of stockholders, our Secretary must receive the nomination no earlier than February 3, 20205, 2022 and no later than March 4, 2020.7, 2022.
Communications with the Board of Directors
Interested parties wishing to communicate with our board of directors or with individual members of our board of directors may do so by writing to our board of directors or to the particular members of our board of directors, and mailing the correspondence to our General Counsel at Sunrun Inc., 595 Market225 Bush Street, 29th Floor,Suite 1400, San Francisco, CA 94105.94104. Our General Counsel, in consultation with appropriate members of our board of directors as necessary, will review all incoming communications and, if appropriate, such communications will be forwarded to the appropriate member or members of our board of directors, or if none is specified, to the Chairman of our board of directors.
ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance)
At Sunrun, sustainability is core to our business model and our corporate culture. We embed best practices for environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) performance throughout our organization and publish an annual Sunrun Impact Report, disclosing our performance using various widely accepted frameworks, including the Global Reporting Initiative (“GRI”) guidelines. ESG performance and reporting is overseen internally by our ESG Committee of senior management and at the board level by our nominating and corporate governance committee. Highlights of our ESG initiatives include the following:
•We are already a deeply carbon negative company, and we seek to help our customers and partners become carbon negative as well. In 2020, our Networked Solar Energy Capacity prevented GHG emissions totaling an estimated 2.4 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (“CO2e”). In 2020, we installed more than 600 megawatts of solar to over 84,000 Customers. These systems are expected to prevent the emission of over 13 million metric tons of CO2e over the next thirty years.
•In 2018, Sunrun committed to develop a minimum of 100 megawatts of solar on affordable multi-family housing, where 80% of tenants fall below 60% of the area median income, during the next decade. This commitment will directly benefit at least 50,000 households, and we intend to expand these programs in other states. •Sunrun works with vendors that share our commitment to creating a better, greener, and kinder planet. That is why we included policies on environmental protection and sustainability as well as responsible mineral sourcing in our Vendor Code of Conduct, which was adopted in 2019.
•We were the first national solar company to achieve 100% gender pay parity in 2018.
•We strive to create an open and inclusive culture where everyone’s unique backgrounds, thoughts, experiences and abilities are welcomed, valued, respected and celebrated. As of December 31, 2020, women comprised 44% of Sunrun’s Board of Directors and 50% of our executive management team. Our organizational leadership included approximately 21% women, and approximately 23% of all Sunrun employees are women.
•Sunrun is dedicated to providing training, education, and development to all of our employees. We offer cross-functional training, beginning with new-hire orientation and covering all levels up to advanced leadership training for senior managers.
To learn more about our ESG efforts, please see our annual Sunrun Impact Report at investors.sunrun.com, which we expect to update after the date of this proxy statement. (The inclusion of any website address in this proxy statement does not incorporate by reference the information on or accessible through the website into this proxy statement.)
Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Our board of directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that address items such as the qualifications and responsibilities of our directors and director candidates and corporate governance policies and standards applicable to us in general. In addition, our board of directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and other executive and senior financial officers. The full text of our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on the Corporate Governance portion of our website at www.sunrun.com on the “Governance Documents” page under “Investorsthe “Investor Relations – CorporateLeadership & Governance”. section. We will post amendments to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or waivers of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for directors and executive officers on the same website.
Risk Management
Risk is inherent with every business, and we face a number of risks, including strategic, financial, business and operational, political, regulatory, legal and compliance, and reputational. We have designed and implemented processes to manage risk in our operations. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of risks the company faces, while our board of directors, as a whole and assisted by its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. In its risk oversight role, our board of directors has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are appropriate and functioning as designed.
Our board of directors believes that open communication between management and our board of directors is essential for effective risk management and oversight. Our board of directors meets with our Chief Executive Officer and other members of the senior management team at quarterly meetings of our board of directors, where, among other topics, they discuss our quarterly enterprise risk assessment, key strategy and risks facing the company, as well as at such other times as they deem appropriate.
While our board of directors is ultimately responsible for risk oversight, our board committees assist our board of directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in certain areas of risk. Our audit committee assists our board of directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to risk management in the areas of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, legal and regulatory compliance, and discusses with management and the independent auditor guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. Our audit committee also reviews our major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control these exposures. Our audit committee also monitors certain key risks on a regular basis throughout the fiscal year, such as risk associated with internal control over financial reporting, liquidity risk, and liquidity risk.cyber security risks. Our nominating and corporate governance committee assists our board of directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risk associated with board organization, membership and structure, corporate governance, and corporate governance.ESG-related risks. Our compensation committee assesses risks created by the incentives inherent in our compensation policies. Finally, our full board of directors reviews strategic and operational risks in the context of reports from the management team, receives reports on significant committee activities, and evaluates the risks inherent in significant transactions.
Director Compensation
We have a non-employee director pay policy pursuant to which our unaffiliated, non-employee directors are eligible to receive equity awards and annual cash compensation for service on our board of directors and committees of our board of directors.
2018 Cash Compensation
For 2018 ourOur non-employee directors were entitled to receive the following cash compensation for their services under our non-employee director pay policy for their services:policy:
•$50,000 per year for service as a board member;
•$25,000 per year for service as the lead independent director;
•$25,000 per year for service as chair of the audit committee;
•$10,00015,000 per year for service as chair of the compensation committee;
•$5,00010,000 per year for service as chair of the nominating and corporate governance committee; and
•$10,000 per year for service as a non-chairperson member of the audit committee;
•$7,500 per year for service as a non-chairperson member of the compensation committee; and
•$5,000 per year for services as a non-chairperson member of the nominating and corporate governance committee.
All cash payments to non-employee directors are paid quarterly and newly hired directors receive a pro-rata cash fee.
2019 Cash Compensation
In March 2019, with the assistance of our compensation consultant, Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (Meridian), we analyzed our non-employee director compensation practices. Meridian advised that our non-employee director pay was well below the median of our peer group. Accordingly, in March 2019 we amended our non-employee director compensation policy to increase the cash compensation payable to our non-employee directors in order to approximate the median of our peer group. Commencing in 2019 our non-employee directors were entitled to receive the following cash compensation under our non-employee director pay policy for their services:
$50,000 per year for service as a board member;
$25,000 per year for service as the lead independent director;
$25,000 per year for service as chair of the audit committee;
$15,000 per year for service as chair of the compensation committee;
$10,000 per year for service as chair of the nominating and corporate governance committee;
$10,000 per year for service as a non-chairperson member of the audit committee;
$7,500 per year for service as a non-chairperson member of the compensation committee; and
$5,000 per year for services as a non-chairperson member of the nominating and corporate governance committee.
Equity Compensation
Under our non-employee director compensation policy, each non-employee director who is serving on January 1st1st of an applicable fiscal year will receive an annual restricted stock unit (“RSU”) award grant on such date, or the next trading day if January 1st1st is not a trading date, with the number of shares subject to the RSU award determined based on a specified dollar value and the closing trading price of our stock on the date of grant. Newly appointed or elected non-employee directors receive on the date of their initial appointment or election a pro-ratedprorated RSU grant their first year of service, with the number of shares subject to the RSU award value determined in proportion to the length of active service expected to be provided by such on-employeenon-employee director during theirhis or her first fiscal year.year of service. These RSU awards vest 100% on January 1st1st the year following the date of grant, subject to the non-employee directors’ continued service on our board of directors through the vesting date.
For 20182020, under our amended and restated non-employee director pay policy, our non-employee directors were each granted an annual restricted stock unit (“RSU”)RSU award having a value of $100,000$155,000 (or the applicable pro-ratedprorated value), as determined on the applicable date of grant. Under our amended non-employee director compensation policy, for 2019 the RSU grants to our non-employee directors will have a value of $155,000 (or the applicable pro-rated value), as determined on the applicable date of grant, which increase was made to more closely align with the median pay practices of our peer group.
Director Compensation for Fiscal Year 20182020
The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation received by our non-employee directors during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2018:2020:
| | Director | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | | Stock Awards ($) (1) | | Total ($) | Director | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | | Stock Awards ($) (1) | | Total ($) |
Katherine August-deWilde (2) | | $ | 60,000 |
| | $ | 100,000 |
| | $ | 160,000 |
| Katherine August-deWilde (2) | | $ | 71,346 | | | $ | 155,000 | | | $ | 226,346 | |
Leslie Dach (2) | | $ | 55,000 |
| | $ | 100,000 |
| | $ | 155,000 |
| Leslie Dach (2) | | $ | 67,308 | | | $ | 155,000 | | | $ | 222,308 | |
Alan Ferber (2) (3) | | $ | 45,750 |
| | $ | 91,663 |
| | $ | 137,413 |
| |
Mary Powell (2) (3) | | $ | 45,750 |
| | $ | 91,663 |
| | $ | 137,413 |
| |
Alan Ferber (2) | | Alan Ferber (2) | | $ | 62,500 | | | $ | 155,000 | | | $ | 217,500 | |
Mary Powell (2) | | Mary Powell (2) | | $ | 67,500 | | | $ | 155,000 | | | $ | 222,500 | |
Gerald Risk (2) | | $ | 75,000 |
| | $ | 100,000 |
| | $ | 175,000 |
| Gerald Risk (2) | | $ | 100,000 | | | $ | 155,000 | | | $ | 255,000 | |
Steven Vassallo (2) | | $ | 60,000 |
| | $ | 100,000 |
| | $ | 160,000 |
| |
Richard Wong (4) | | — |
| | $ | 100,000 |
| | $ | 100,000 |
| |
Ellen Smith (2) | | Ellen Smith (2) | | $ | 11,475 | | | $ | 35,574 | | | $ | 47,049 | |
______________________
| |
(1) | (1) The amounts reported in the Stock Awards column represent the grant date fair value of the stock awards granted to the named directors during 2018 as computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 Compensation Stock Compensation or ASC 718. Note that the amounts reported in the column reflect the accounting cost for these stock awards, and do not correspond to the actual economic value that may be received by the named directors from the stock award |
| |
(2) | Equity incentive awards outstanding at December 31, 2018 for each non-employee director were as follows: (i) Ms. August-deWilde had 16,891 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which 100% vested on January 1, 2019, (ii) Mr. Dach had 16,891 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which 100% vested on January 1, 2019 and 100,000 vested stock options, (iii) Mr. Risk had 16,891 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which 100% vested on January 1, 2019 and 120,000 vested stock options, (iv) Mr. Vassallo had 16,891 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which 100% vested on January 1, 2019, (v) Mr. Ferber had 15,101 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which 100% vested on January 1, 2019 and (vi) Ms. Powell had 15,101 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which 100% vested on January 1, 2019. |
| |
(3) | Mr. Ferber and Ms. Powell were each appointed to our board of directors effective February 1, 2018. |
| |
(4) | Mr. Wong resigned from our board of directors effective March 1, 2018. |
Our directors who are alsoduring 2020 as computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 Compensation Stock Compensation or ASC 718. Note that the amounts reported in the column reflect the accounting cost for these stock awards, and do not correspond to the actual economic value that may be received by the non-employee directors from the stock awards.
(2) Equity incentive awards outstanding as of December 31, 2020 for each non-employee director were as follows: (i) Ms. August-deWilde had 10,927 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which 100% vested on January 1, 2021, (ii) Mr. Dach had 10,927 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which 100% vested on January 1, 2021 and 50,000 vested stock options, (iii) Mr. Ferber had 10,927 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which 100% vested on January 1, 2021, (iv) Ms. Powell had 10,927 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which 100% vested on January 1, 2021, (v) Mr. Risk had 10,927 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which 100% vested on January 1, 2021 and 120,000 vested stock options, and (vi) Ms. Smith had 504 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which 100% vested on January 1, 2021.
During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, Lynn Jurich, Edward Fenster and David Bywater were employees of the Company and did not receive no additional compensation for their service as directors. During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, Lynn Jurich and Edward Fenster were our employees. See the section titled “Executive Compensation” for additional information about the compensation paid to Ms. Jurich and Mr. Fenster.
Messrs. Fenster and Bywater.
PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our board of directors is currently composed of eightnine members. Effective as of the Annual Meeting date, the board of directors will decrease the number of authorized directors from eight to seven, in accordance with our amended and restated bylaws, in light of Mr. Vassallo's decision to not stand for re-election. In accordance with our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our board of directors is divided into three staggered classes of directors. At the Annual Meeting, twothree Class IIII directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the three Class I directors whose term is then expiring.term.
Each director’s term continues until the election and qualification of his or her successor, or such director’s earlier death, resignation, or removal. Any increase or decrease in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one-third of our directors. This classification of our board of directors may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control of our company.
Nominees
Our nominating and corporate governance committee has recommended, and our board of directors has approved, Lynn JurichKatherine August-deWilde, Sonita Lontoh, and Alan FerberGerald Risk as nominees for election as Class IIII directors at the Annual Meeting. If elected, Ms. JurichAugust de-Wilde, Ms. Lontoh, and Mr. FerberRisk will serve as Class IIII directors until our 20222024 annual meeting of stockholders. Each of the nominees isMs. August de-Wilde and Mr. Risk are both currently a directordirectors of our company. For information concerning the nominees, please see the section titled “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance.” Ellen Smith, a current Class III director, is not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting.
If you are a stockholder of record and you sign your proxy card or vote by telephone or over the Internet but do not give instructions with respect to the voting of directors, your shares will be voted “FOR” the election of Ms. JurichAugust de-Wilde, Ms. Lontoh, and Mr. Ferber.Risk. We expect that each of Ms. JurichAugust de-Wilde, Ms. Lontoh, and Mr. FerberRisk will accept such nomination; however, in the event that a director nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee designated by our board of directors to fill such vacancy. If you are a street name stockholder and you do not give voting instructions to your broker or nominee, your broker will leave your shares unvoted on this matter.
Vote Required
The election of directors requires a plurality vote of the shares of our common stock present in personvirtually or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. Broker non-votes and abstentions will have no effect on this proposal.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”
EACH OF THE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.
PROPOSAL NO. 2
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Our audit committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”EY”), independent registered public accountants, to audit our consolidated financial statements for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2019.2021. During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, E&Y2020, EY served as our independent registered public accounting firm.
Notwithstanding the appointment of E&YEY and even if our stockholders ratify the appointment, our audit committee, in its discretion, may appoint another independent registered public accounting firm at any time during our fiscal year if our audit committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of our company and our stockholders. At the Annual Meeting, our stockholders are being asked to ratify the appointment of E&YEY as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2019.2021. Our audit committee is submitting the appointment of E&YEY to our stockholders because we value our stockholders’ views on our independent registered public accounting firm and as a matter of good corporate governance. Representatives of E&YEY will be present at the virtual Annual Meeting, and they will have an opportunity to make a statement and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from our stockholders.
If our stockholders do not ratify the appointment of E&Y,EY, our board of directors may reconsider the appointment.
Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The following table presents fees for professional audit services and other services rendered to our company by E&YEY for our fiscal years ended December 31, 20182020 and 2017.2019.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2018 | | 2017 |
Audit Fees (1) | | $ | 6,463,000 |
| | $ | 5,335,050 |
|
Audit-Related Fees (2) | | — |
| | 50,000 |
|
Tax Fees (3) | | — |
| | 12,500 |
|
All Other Fees (4) | | 1,995 |
| | 1,995 |
|
Total Fees | | $ | 6,464,995 |
| | $ | 5,399,545 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
Audit Fees (1) | | $ | 7,258,000 | | | $ | 4,184,000 | |
Audit-Related Fees | | — | | | — | |
Tax Fees (2) | | 484,000 | | | — | |
All Other Fees (3) | | 1,665 | | | 1,995 | |
Total Fees | | $ | 7,743,665 | | | $ | 4,185,995 | |
______________________
| |
(1) | Audit fees for 2018 and 2017 consist of fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, including fees related to adoptions of the new revenue and lease standards, estimated fees for audits of investment funds to be performed and review of our quarterly consolidated financial statements and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC. Audit fees for 2018 also include fees for professional services provided in connection with E&Y’s report on internal controls over financial reporting for the consolidated financial statements. |
| |
(2) | Audit-related fees for 2017 consist of consultations on internal controls over financial reporting. |
| |
(3) | Tax fees for 2017 principally include fees for tax compliance. |
| |
(4) | All other fees consist of fees for accessing E&Y’s online research database. |
(1) Audit Fees for 2020 and 2019 consist of fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, including fees related to audits of investment funds to be performed, review of our quarterly consolidated financial statements, assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC andprofessional services provided in connection with EY’s report on internal controls over financial reporting for the consolidated financial statements. The Audit Fees incurred in 2020 also include fees relating to services performed in connection with the acquisition of Vivint Solar, Inc. and estimated fees for audits of Vivint investment funds to be performed.
(2) Tax Fees consist of fees for tax advice and tax planning. These services included tax advice related to the Vivint acquisition.
(3) All other fees consist of fees for accessing EY’s online research database.
Auditor Independence
In our fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2020, there were no other professional services provided by E&YEY that would have required our audit committee to consider their compatibility with maintaining the independence of E&Y.EY.
Audit Committee Policy on Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Our audit committee has established a policy governing our use of the services of our independent registered public accounting firm. Under this policy, our audit committee is required to pre-approve all audit and non‑auditnon-audit services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm in order to ensure that the provision of such services does not impair the public accountants’ independence. All fees paid to E&YEY for our fiscal years ended December 31, 20182020 and 20172019 were pre-approved by our audit committee.
Vote Required
The ratification of the appointment of E&YEY as our independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in personvirtually or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote AGAINST the proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”
THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP.
PROPOSAL NO. 3
ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION
OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 or the Dodd-Frank Act,(the “Dodd-Frank Act”) and Section 14A of the Exchange Act, our stockholders are entitled to vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with SEC rules.
This proposal, commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers’ compensation as a whole. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation or any specific named executive officer, but rather the overall compensation of all of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. The compensation of our named executive officers is disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the related narrative disclosure contained in this proxy statement. As discussed in these disclosures, we believe that our compensation policies and decisions are based on principles that reflect a “pay-for-performance” philosophy and are strongly aligned with our stockholders’ interests and consistent with current market practices. Compensation of our named executive officers is designed to enable us to attract and retain talented and experienced executives to lead us successfully in a competitive environment.
Accordingly, our board of directors is asking our stockholders to indicate their support for the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this proxy statement, by casting a non-binding advisory vote “FOR” the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Sunrun Inc. (the “Company”) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, narrative disclosures, and other related disclosure.”
Vote Required
Advisory approval of this Proposal No. 3 requires the vote of the holders a majority of the shares present in personvirtually or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon.
Because the vote is advisory, it is not binding on us, our compensation committee or our board of directors. Nevertheless, the views expressed by the stockholders, whether through this vote or otherwise, are important to management and our board of directors and, accordingly, the board of directors and the compensation committee intend to consider the results of this vote in making determinations in the future regarding executive compensation arrangements.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”
THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
PROPOSAL NO. 4 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING REPORTING ON EMPLOYEE ARBITRATION
ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY STOCKHOLDER VOTES
TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERSIn accordance with SEC rules, we have set forth below a stockholder proposal, along with a supporting statement, exactly as submitted by Nia Impact Capital. Nia Impact Capital has notified us that it has been a continuous owner of shares of our common stock with a market value of at least $2,000 for at least a year and intends to present the following proposal at the annual meeting. Nia Impact Capital’s address is 1212 Preservation Parkway, Suite 200, Oakland, California 94612. The stockholder proposal will be required to be voted upon at the annual meeting only if properly presented.
Stockholder Proposal and Supporting Statement
***
RESOLVED:
Shareholders of Sunrun Inc. (“Sunrun”) ask the Board of Directors to oversee the preparation of a public report on the impact of the use of mandatory arbitration on Sunrun’s employees and workplace culture. The report should evaluate the impact of Sunrun’s current use of arbitration on the prevalence of harassment and discrimination in its workplace and on employees’ ability to seek redress. The report should be prepared at reasonable cost and omit proprietary and personal information.
WHEREAS:
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 states that it is unlawful “to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.”1 Nevertheless, 48 percent of African Americans and 36 percent of Hispanics have experienced race-based workplace discrimination.2 More than half of senior-level women say that they have been sexually harassed during their careers, with African American women facing an increased relative risk of sexual harassment in the workplace.3 A workplace that tolerates harassment invites legal, brand, financial and human capital risk. Companies may experience reduced morale, lost productivity, absenteeism and challenges in attracting and retaining talent. Unexpected leadership changes following allegations of harassment or discrimination put shareholder value at risk.
In contrast, research by McKinsey & Company found that companies with high levels of ethnic and cultural diversity are 33 percent more likely to outperform in profitability while those in the top quartile for gender diversity are 27 percent more likely to have superior value creation.4 A study by the Wall Street Journal found that over the five-year period ended June 28, 2019, the 20 most diverse companies in the S&P 500 had an average annual stock return that was almost six percent higher than the 20 least diverse companies.5
Sunrun requires its employees to agree to arbitrate employment-related claims. Mandatory arbitration limits employees’ remedies for wrongdoing, keeps misconduct secret and prevents employees from learning about shared concerns.6
Arbitration clauses face a changing regulatory landscape. Attorneys general from every state voiced support for ending forced arbitration of sexual harassment claims in 2018. In 2019, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill banning mandatory arbitration. California banned the use of arbitration agreements as a condition of employment, Washington state invalidated contracts requiring arbitration of sexual harassment claims and the New York Supreme Court refused to compel arbitration in a harassment lawsuit. Continuing to rely on arbitration clauses for protections, when these may be removed retroactively, creates a long-tail risk for our company.
1https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/titlevii.cfm
2https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/poll-64-percent-americans-say-racism-remains- majorproblemn877536
3https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-metoo-has-to-do-with-the-workplace-gender-gap-1540267680; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/gwao.12394
4https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/organization/our%20insights/delivering%20through%20diversity/delivering-through-diversity_full-report.ashx
5https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-business-case-for-more-diversity-11572091200
6https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/systemic/review/
***
Opposing Statement of the Board
The Dodd-Frank ActCompany condemns discrimination and Section 14Aharassment of any kind and is fully committed to creating a workplace that is both respectful and safe and in which our employees are able to thrive and fulfill their potential. In addition, the Exchange Act enable our stockholders to indicate their preference at least once every six years regarding how frequently we should solicit a non-binding advisory vote onCompany takes seriously the compensationviews of our named executive officers as disclosed inshareholders and values input from all of our proxy statement. Accordingly, as required by these rules,stakeholders. However, and notwithstanding that we also are asking our stockholders to provide their input with regardstrongly committed to the frequency of future advisory stockholder votes ongoals we believe underlie the compensation for our named executive officers (such as Proposal No. 3 of this proxy statement). In particular, we are asking whether the advisory vote on executive compensation should occur once every year, every two years, or every three years.
After careful consideration of the frequency alternatives, our board of directors has determined that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation is the most appropriate alternative for us and our stockholders at this time. The board of director’s determination was influenced by the fact that the compensation of our named executive officers is evaluated, adjusted and approved on an annual basis. As part of the annual review process,proposal, the board of directors believes that stockholder sentiment should be a factor thatthis proposal is taken into consideration by the board of directors and the compensation committee in making decisions with respect to executive compensation. By providing an advisory vote on executive compensation on an annual basis, our stockholders will be able to provide us with direct input on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosedneither necessary nor in the proxy statement every year. best interests of Sunrun or its stockholders and therefore recommends a vote against the stockholder proposal.
We understandbelieve that maintaining our stockholders may have different views as to whatarbitration provision is in the best approachinterests of the company for us,a number of important reasons and we look forwardthat these same reasons explain why such provisions are so prevalent among employers, including many of our peers. Arbitration offers an alternative form of adjudication by an experienced jurist selected with both parties’ equal participation, which is often faster and less costly than a court proceeding, especially in jurisdictions where courts are overburdened. Outcomes are also more certain because they typically may not be appealed, absent extraordinary circumstances. The employer must pay any costs of the proceedings unique to hearingthe arbitration forum, while the overall expediency benefits both parties with a fair and relatively prompt resolution. Moreover, employees can benefit from our stockholders on this agenda item every year.
Stockholders are not voting to approve or disapprove the board of directors’ recommendation. Instead, stockholders may indicate their preference regarding the frequency ofarbitration as future non-binding advisory “say-on-pay” votes by selecting one year, two years or three years. Stockholders thatprospective employers do not have a preference regardingdirect public access or records of their arbitration filings against former employers, which some employees maintain will affect their ability to secure future employment.
These efficiencies and other benefits come with protections built in to address the frequency of future advisory votes may abstain from voting onconcerns raised in the proposal. ForMore specifically, our arbitration provision does not limit remedies available to our employees and allows for transparency and sharing of information. Sunrun’s standard arbitration provision specifically states that the reasons discussed above,parties are entitled to all remedies available in a court of law. Nor does arbitration place any additional financial burdens on employees, as our standard arbitration provision makes clear that employees are not required to pay any costs in excess of what they would pay if they were in court. Employees may publicize the results of an arbitration (other than any trade secrets or proprietary business information), and in some circumstances an employee and/or Sunrun may be obligated to file an arbitration award with a court of law. Arbitration provisions do not impede employees’ freedom to first file public lawsuits in court, and arbitration only continues thereafter in a confidential arbitration forum if the court compels the underlying claims to arbitration. Further, employees in arbitration are entitled to the discovery of relevant information to the same extent as they are in a court of law. Finally, our arbitration provision does not limit the ability of employees to discuss shared concerns amongst themselves or with management, including with regard to harassment or discrimination in the workplace (the latter of which communications are protected by law) and employees are explicitly encouraged to discuss shared concerns amongst themselves and with management pursuant to Sunrun’s Open Door Policy.
More generally, and as we have pledged in our public annual Impact Report, Sunrun has designed our workplace and policies to provide all employees with a respectful and safe working environment by prohibiting discrimination, harassment, retaliation, or other mistreatment at work. We have a separate and independent employee relations function responsible for investigating employment-related misconduct, and this function includes conducting internal investigations for our core policies such as our non-harassment, non-discrimination, and non-retaliation policies. Additionally, we are askingnot aware of any study that has found any correlation between the use of arbitration agreements and the prevalence of harassment or discrimination complaints or lawsuits in the workplace.
For these reasons, we believe that implementation of the proposal, including preparation of the requested report, is neither necessary nor would it serve the stated goals of the proposal. Not only does our stockholdersarbitration provision serve an important purpose – without inappropriately limiting the remedies available to voteemployees or their ability to hold advisory votes onshare information – the compensationreport requested by the proposal would not provide sufficient details (and it would be difficult for us, within privacy constraints, to provide sufficient details) to allow shareholders to meaningfully assess and evaluate our named executive officers every year.
You may cast your vote by choosingprocesses regarding arbitration of employment-related claims. The resources that would be devoted to preparation of the option of one year, two years, three years, or abstain from voting in response to the resolution set forth below:
“RESOLVED, that the option of once every year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast for this resolution willrequested report would be determined to be the preferred frequency with which Sunrun Inc. (the “Company”) is to hold an advisory vote by stockholders to approve the compensation paid tobetter directed toward the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuantcontinued efforts to Item 402 of Securitiesexecute on tangible workplace goals and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, narrative disclosures, and other related disclosure.”our mission.
Vote Required
The choiceproposal relating to a public report on the use of frequency that receivesmandatory arbitration requires the highest numberaffirmative vote of votes froma majority of the shares of our common stock present in personvirtually or represented by proxy at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting and entitled to vote thereonthereon. Abstentions will be consideredhave the frequency preferred byeffect of a vote AGAINST the stockholders. You may vote for “1 Year,” “2 Years,” “3 Years,” or “ABSTAIN” on this proposal. Abstentionsproposal and broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of this proposal.have no effect.
Even though your vote is advisory and, therefore, will not be binding on us, our board of directors and our compensation committee intend to consider the outcome of the vote when determining how often we should submit to stockholders an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR “1 YEAR” AS “AGAINST”
THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY STOCKHOLDER VOTES TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION.PROPOSAL REGARDING REPORTING ON EMPLOYEE ARBITRATION.
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The audit committee is a committee of the board of directors comprised solely of independent directors as required by the Nasdaq listing standards and rules and regulations of the SEC. The audit committee operates under a written charter approved by the board of directors, which is available on the company’s website at www.sunrun.com on the “Governance Documents” page under “Investorsthe “Investor Relations – CorporateLeadership & Governance”. section. The composition of the audit committee, the attributes of its members and the responsibilities of the audit committee, as reflected in its charter, are intended to be in accordance with applicable requirements for corporate audit committees. The audit committee reviews and assesses the adequacy of its charter and the audit committee’s performance on an annual basis.
With respect to the company’s financial reporting process, the management of the company is responsible for (1) establishing and maintaining internal controls and (2) preparing the company’s consolidated financial statements. The company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”EY”), is responsible for auditing these financial statements. It is the responsibility of the audit committee to oversee these activities. It is not the responsibility of the audit committee to prepare the company’s financial statements. These are the fundamental responsibilities of management. In the performance of its oversight function, the audit committee has:
• reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management and E&Y;EY;
• discussed with E&YEY the matters required to be discussed by the Statement on Auditing Standards No. 1301, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1. AU section 380), and as adopted byapplicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T;and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”); and
• received the written disclosures and the letter from E&YEY required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with E&YEY its independence.
Based on the audit committee’s review and discussions with management and E&Y,EY, the audit committee recommended to the board of directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182020 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").SEC.
Respectfully submitted by the members of the audit committee of the board of directors:
Gerald Risk (Chair)
Steven VassalloLeslie Dach
Katherine August-deWildeMary Powell
This report of the audit committee is required by the SEC and, in accordance with the SEC’s rules, will not be deemed to be part of or incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act, or under the Exchange Act, , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and will not otherwise be deemed “soliciting material” or “filed” under either the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table identifies certain information about our executive officers as of April 18, 2019.21, 2021. Our executive officers are appointed by, and serve at the discretion of, our board of directors. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | | Age | | Position |
Lynn Jurich | | 3941 | | Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Edward Fenster | | 4244 | | Executive Chairman and Director |
Bob KominTom vonReichbauer | | 5639 | | Chief Financial Officer |
Chris Dawson | | 5052 | | Chief Operating Officer |
Jeanna Steele | | 4446 | | General Counsel & Corporate Secretary |
Lynn Jurich. Ms. Jurich is one of our co-founders and has served as our Chief Executive Officer since March 2014 and as a member of our board of directors since inception. Ms. Jurich served as our Co-Chief Executive Officer from October 2012 to March 2014, our President from January 2009 to October 2012, and our Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing from 2007 to January 2009. From July 2002 to July 2005, Ms. Jurich served as an associate at Summit Partners, a private equity firm. Ms. Jurich serves on the board of directors of privately held Generate Capital, Inc. Ms. Jurich holds a B.S. in Science, Technology, and Society from Stanford University and an M.B.A. from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.
Edward Fenster. Mr. Fenster is one of our co-founders and has served as our Executive Chairman since March 2014 and as a member of our board of directors since inception. Mr. Fenster served as our Chief Executive Officer from June 2008 to October 2012, and our Co-Chief Executive Officer from October 2012 to March 2014. From May 2003 to June 2005, Mr. Fenster served as Director of Corporate Development at Asurion, LLC, a technologyprovider of device protection andinsurance, warranty & support company.services for cell phones, consumer electronics & home appliances. From July 1999 to May 2003, Mr. Fenster worked at The Blackstone Group, a private equity firm. Mr. Fenster holds a B.A. in Economicseconomics from Johns Hopkins University and an M.B.A. from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.
Bob KominTom vonReichbauer. . Mr. KominvonReichbauer has served as our Chief Financial Officer since March 2015.May 2020. Mr. vonReichbauer served as a Vice President at Google LLC, an internet services company, from September 2018 until May 2020. From SeptemberJanuary 2013 to January 2015,September 2018, Mr. Komin served as Chief Financial Officer at Flurry, Inc., a mobile analytics and advertising company. From August 2012 to August 2013, Mr. Komin served as Chief Financial Officer at Ticketfly, Inc., a ticket-distribution service provider. From January 2010 to July 2012, Mr. KominvonReichbauer served in various executive roles at Linden Research,Nest Labs, Inc., a developer of digital entertainment,smart home products company, including asChief Business Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Previously, Mr. Komin also served as Chief Financial Officer at Solexel, Inc., a thin-silicon solar company, Tellme Networks, Inc., a telephone-based applications company, and XOR, Inc., a business application solution provider. Mr. KominvonReichbauer holds a B.S. in Accounting and General Science from the University of Oregoneconomics and an M.B.A. from the Harvard Business School.Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
Chris Dawson. Mr. Dawson joined us as our Chief Operating Officer on December 6, 2017. Mr. Dawson co-founded and served as a partner at Odyssey Advisors Ltd., a management consulting firm, from February 2017 to December 2017. Prior to that, Mr. Dawson was the Chief Operating Officer of Icon Aircraft, a consumer sport plane manufacturer, from August 2015 to September 2016. Previously, Mr. Dawson was with Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc., a recreational vehicle and powersports engine manufacturer, from 1998 to 2015, where he was most recently Vice President & General Manager, Global Sales and Consumer Experience division from April 2014 to August 2015 and previously Vice President & General Manager, BRP International Division from 2008 to 2014. Mr. Dawson holds a bachelor’s degree in commerce from Queens University and an MBAM.B.A. from INSEAD.
Jeanna Steele. Ms. Steele has served as our General Counsel & Corporate Secretary since May 2018. From March 2015 to May 2018, Ms. Steele served in various roles at our company, including Head of Litigation. Previously, Ms. Steele was an attorney at the law firm Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. Ms. Steele serves on the board of directors of the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, and she is a former member of the California Pay Equity Task Force, the first of its kind in the nation. Ms. Steele holds a B.A. in English from McGill University and a J.D. from the University of San Francisco.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
We became a public company in 2015 and we filed our 2016, 2017 and 2018 proxy statements under the scaled-down reporting rules applicable to emerging growth companies. As of the close of calendar year 2018, we ceased to be an emerging growth company and, therefore, this year's Proxy Statement includes additional detail regarding executive compensation that was previously not required, including: this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, additional compensation tables for "Grants of Plan-Based Awards," "Option Exercises and Stock Vested," and "Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control," an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, which is included as Proposal 3 in this Proxy Statement; and an advisory vote on the preferred frequency of advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers, which is included as Proposal 4 in this Proxy Statement.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides an overview of the material components of our executive compensation program during 20182020 for:
•Lynn Jurich, our Chief Executive Officer and Director;
•Tom vonReichbauer, our Chief Financial Officer;
•Edward Fenster, our Executive Chairman and Director;
Bob Komin,•David Bywater, Director and formerly our Chief Financial Officer;Executive Officer of Vivint Solar, Inc.1;
Jeanna Steele, our General Counsel;
Christopher•Chris Dawson, our Chief Operating Officer; and
| |
• | Paul Winnowski, our former President(1)•Bob Komin, our former Chief Financial Officer
|
______________________
| |
(1)
| Mr. Winnowski’s employment terminated on April 1, 2018 |
We refer to these current and former executive officers collectively in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the accompanying compensation tables as our named executive officers or NEOs. The material terms of the compensation provided to our NEOs for 20182020 is described in this section and is intended to supplement the disclosures in the Fiscal 2020 Summary Compensation Table and other tables that follow this section. This section also discusses our executive compensation philosophy, objectives, and design; how and why the compensation committee arrived at the specific compensation policies and decisions involving our executive team, including our NEOs, during 2018;2020; the role Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (Meridian)(“Meridian”), our outsidethe compensation committee’s independent compensation consultant for executive compensation decisions for 2018;2020; and the peer companies and other criteria used in evaluating and setting executive officer compensation.
1Mr. Bywater ceased to serve as CEO of Vivint Solar, Inc. and as one of our executive officers in April 2021.
Executive Summary 2018— 2020 Financial and Business Highlights
Sunrun’s mission is to provide homeowners with clean,create a planet run by the sun and build an affordable solar energy system that combats climate change and storage, and a best-in-class customer experience.provides energy access for all. In 2007, we pioneered the residential solar service model, creating a low-cost solution for homeowners seeking to lower their energy bills. Since our founding, we have significantly expanded our operations culminating in our acquisition of Vivint Solar, Inc. in October 2020, and we now have over 550,000 Customers.
By removing the high initial cost and complexity that used to define the residential solar industry, we have fostered the industry’s rapid growth and exposed an enormous market opportunity. Our relentless drive to increase the accessibility of solar energy is fueled by our enduring vision: to create a planet run by the sun. Our core solar service offerings are provided through our lease and power purchase agreements which we refer to as our “Customer Agreements” and which provide homeownerscustomers with simple, predictable pricing for solar energy that is insulated from rising retail electricity prices. While homeownerscustomers have the option to purchase a solar energy system outright from us, most of our customers choose to buy solar as a service from us through our Customer Agreements and enjoy the flexibility and savings that come from purchasing solar energy without the significant upfront investment of purchasing a solar energy system. With our solar service offerings, we install solar energy systems on our customers’ homes and provide them the solar power produced by those systems for a typically 2020- or 25-year initial term. In addition, we monitor, maintain and insure the system at no additional cost to our customers during the term of the contract. In exchange, we typically receive 20 or 25 years of predictable cash flows from high credit quality customers and qualify for tax and other benefits. We are continuing to develop valuable customer relationships that can extend beyond the initial service term and provide us an opportunity to offer additional services in the future, such as our BrightboxTM home battery storage service now being offered in certain markets.service.
Since our founding, we have significantly expanded our operations and now have a workforce of over 4,000 employees and have provided our solar service offerings to over 233,000 customers in 22 states as well as the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. Our solar systems have prevented greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions totaling 3.7 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e), which is an amount comparable to eliminating more than nine billion passenger vehicle miles or comparable to the emissions prevented by not burning approximately 1.86 million metric tons of coal.
In 2018,2020, we achieved the following key financial and operating results:
We increased•In October 2020, Sunrun completed its acquisition of Vivint Solar, Inc. The transaction solidified Sunrun’s position as the leader in home solar and energy services across the United States and a top owner of solar assets globally with more than three gigawatts of solar energy. The Vivint Solar acquisition expands our megawatts (MW) deployed from 323MWs in 2017 to 373MWs in 2018, representingscale and solidifies our position as a 15% year-over-year increase;top owner of solar assets globally with nearly four gigawatts of Networked Solar Energy Capacity.
•Net earning assetsWe ended the year with more than 550,000 Customers, 18% year-over-year growth, pro-forma to include Vivint Solar.
•We have increased our Solar Energy Capacity Installed from 413 megawatts in 2019 to 603 megawatts in 2020, pro-forma to include Vivint Solar.
•We delivered a one- and three-year total shareholder return of approximately 388% and 1042%, respectively.
•Our Gross Earning Assets as of December 31, 20182020 were $1.4$7.8 billion, reflecting an increase of $3.6 billion from the prior year.
•Our Net Earning Assets as of December 31, 2020 were $4.2 billion, reflecting an increase of $2.1 billion from last year.
•In January 2021, Sunrun issued $400 million of 0% coupon convertible senior notes and entered into a 19% year-over-year increase;capped call transaction, increasing the effective conversion price to $157.22 per share.
•Sunrun has now installed more than 16,000 Brightbox systems nationwide, which offer homeowners the ability to power through outages with clean and reliable home energy. In late 2020, Sunrun launched Brightbox to all of the company’s markets.
•In 2020, our Networked Solar Energy Capacity prevented GHG emissions totaling an estimated 2.4 million metric tons of CO2e. In 2020, we installed more than 600 megawatts of solar to over 84,000 Customers. These systems are expected to prevent the emission of over 13 million metric tons of CO2e over the next 30 years.
Definitions:
•Solar Energy Capacity Installed represents the aggregate megawatt production capacity of our solar energy systems that were recognized as Deployments in the period.
◦Deployments represent solar energy systems, whether sold directly to customers or subject to executed Customer Agreements (i) for which we have confirmation that the systems are installed on the roof, subject to final inspection, (ii) in the case of certain system installations by our partners, for which we have accrued at least 80% of the expected project cost, or (iii) for multi-family and any other systems that have reached our internal milestone signaling construction can commence following design completion, measured on the percentage of the system that has been completed based on expected system cost.
•Networked Solar Energy Capacity represents the aggregate megawatt production capacity of our solar energy systems that have been recognized as Deployments, from the company’s inception through the measurement date.
•Gross earning assetsEarning Assets is calculated as Gross Earning Assets Contracted Period plus Gross Earning Assets Renewal Period.
◦Gross Earning Assets Contracted Period represents the present value of the remaining net cash flows (discounted at 5%) during the initial term of our Customer Agreements as of December 31, 2018 were $3.1 billion, a 38% year-over-year increase;the measurement date. It is calculated as the present value of cash flows (discounted at 5%) we expect to receive from Subscribers in future periods, after deducting expected operating and maintenance costs, equipment replacements costs, distributions to tax equity partners in consolidated joint venture partnership flip structures, and distributions to project equity investors. We include cash flows we expect to receive in future periods from state incentive and rebate programs, contracted sales of solar renewable energy credits, and awarded net cash flows from grid service programs with utility or grid operators.
•◦We added over 50,000 customersGross Earning Assets Renewal Period is the forecasted net present value we would receive upon or following the expiration of the initial Customer Agreement term but before the 30th anniversary of the system’s activation (either in 2018, growing our customer base to 233,000,the form of cash payments during any applicable renewal period or a 29% year-over-year increase;
•We increased our consolidated cash balance by approximately $63 millionsystem purchase at the end of 2018; and
We positioned ourselvesthe initial term), for Subscribers as the industry leader in creating a healthy, fair, and equitable workplace culture. We were named a top workplace in multiple publications, including: in the large company category of the “Best Placesmeasurement date. We calculate the Gross Earning Assets Renewal Period amount at the expiration of the initial contract term assuming either a system purchase or a renewal, forecasting only a 30-year customer relationship (although the customer may renew for additional years, or purchase the system), at a contract rate equal to Work90% of the customer’s contractual rate in effect at the Bay Area” published by Fortune Magazine Submitted basedend of the initial contract term. After the initial contract term, our Customer Agreements typically automatically renew on 2018 data, survey results,an annual basis and programs,the rate is initially set at up to a 10% discount to then-prevailing utility power prices.
◦Subscribers represent the cumulative number of Customer Agreements for systems that have been recognized as deployments through the measurement date.
•Net Earning Assets represents Gross Earning Assets, plus total cash, less adjusted debt and published in Fortune in 2019. “Best Companiesless pass-through financing obligations, as of the same measurement date. Debt is adjusted to Work For” in “Medium Sized Companies” published by Forbes.com in 2018, namedexclude a “Companypro-rata share of non-recourse debt associated with funds with project equity structures along with debt associated with the Best CEO” , “Best Companies for Women,”company’s ITC safe harboring facility. Because estimated cash distributions to our project equity partners are deducted from Gross Earning Assets, a proportional share of the corresponding project level non-recourse debt is deducted from Net Earning Assets, as such debt would be serviced from cash flows already excluded from Gross Earning Assets.
•Customers represent the cumulative number of Deployments, from our inception through the measurement date.
•Customer Agreements refer to, collectively, solar power purchase agreements and “Companies with the Best Culture,” as evaluated by Comparably and published in USAToday.com, a “Best Company to Work For in Colorado” by The Denver Post, and “Best Company to Work For in Arizona”, by the Arizona Herald. We also achieved 100% gender pay parity, and were the first national residential solar company to publicly announce this milestone.leases.
Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
We operate in a highly competitive and rapidly evolving market, and we expect competition amongcompete with companies in our market andindustry as well as adjacent spaces to continue to increase. Our ability to compete and succeed in this environment is directly correlated to our ability to recruit, incentivize, and retain talented executives.industries. Due, in part, to the diverse nature of our executive’s responsibilities, the market for skilled personnel is very competitive, and we recruit heavily across a broad array of industries that include but are not limited to: residential solar, retail sales, consumer technology, business-to-business technology, consumer finance, investment banking and residential construction. Our ability to compete and succeed in this environment is directly correlated to our ability to recruit, incentivize, and retain talented executives. Our compensation philosophy is intended to attract and reward talented individuals who possess the skills necessary to expand our business and assist in the achievement of our other strategic goals and thereby create long-term value for our stockholders.
In 2018, ourOur compensation committee reviewed and assessed our compensation philosophy, which is intended to promote Sunrun’s core values. Following this review, the compensation committee and management agreed to a change in compensation philosophy beginning with 2020 pay decisions for the NEOs. More specifically, they agreed that base salary, target bonus opportunities and annual long-term incentive grant values would be targeted within a competitive range of the 50th percentile. They determined that this adjustment was appropriate due to both the competitive nature of cash opportunities in the Company’s market for talent as well as the Company’s maturity.
Our compensation committee believes that the combination of a great work environment, meaningful equity ownership that
aligns the interests of our executive employees with our stockholders, and competitive pay and benefits support a winning team, company, and workplace. Key elements of our compensation philosophy include the following:
Ownership Focus: We believe that all of our executives should have a significant share in the ownership of Sunrun, which we believe best aligns the interests of our executive employees with our stockholders and ensures appropriate incentives are in place to promote a focus on our long-term strategic and financial goals. Therefore, equity compensation is historicallygenerally a larger part of total target compensation for our executive employees than their cash compensation. Our general practice is to weight more heavily onweight equity-based compensation than total cash compensation provided to our executives over multiple years. In any particular year the ratio of awarded equity-based compensation to total compensation may vary because the compensation committee considers various factors in awarding equity, including the amount of unvested equity remaining for each individual executive, the potential compensation that would be realized by the executives for their equity after modeling different potential future stock prices and vesting of their unvested awards, and the dilutive impact to our shareholders of granting new equity awards to our executives.
Flexible and fair:Fair: Our compensation structure is intended to provide fair rewards for each of our executive’s contributions to our performance and creation of long-term shareholder value. We seek to provide target total direct compensation (which includes the components of base salary, annual cashbonus incentive, and equity) that is market competitive, and to provide parity and consistency in the compensation provided to our executives while at the same time retaining the flexibility needed to recruit and retain executive talent and adhering to our budgets.
At-Risk Weighted: We heavily weight our executivesexecutives’ total compensation to “at-risk” pay. We believe focusing heavily on at-risk pay for our executives’executives helps to properly focus our executives’ decisions, resources, and commitment to enterprise imperatives to advance the goals of the organization.
Data in the charts above includes compensation data for those individuals serving in the positions of Chief Executive Officer, Executive Chairman, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and General Counselour named executive officers during 2016-2018. For2018 through 2020 for such years in which the NEO did not holdindividual held the position for the entire year and was designated as an executive officer for the NEO’s base salary and bonus target amounts were annualized. For years in which the NEO did not hold the role for any portion of the applicable year, the compensation data of the NEO’s predecessor holding such position is included.
entire year.
Objectives: Consistent with our compensation philosophy, the primary objectives of our executive compensation programs are to:
•Provide competitive compensation to recruit, retain, and motivate top executive talent to achieve our short and long-term performance goals;
•Align the economic interests of our executive officers and stockholders through the use of equity awards; and
•Reward executives for achievement of our performance goals.
What we do:
•Pay for Performance:Performance: We link pay to performance by generally heavily weighting total executive compensation to at-risk pay.
•Thoughtful Peer Group & Market Analysis:Analysis: Our compensation committee reviews external market data when making compensation decision,decisions, and annually reviews our peer group with its independent compensation consultant. Market data is one of multiple reference points our compensation committee considers when making pay decisions.
•Thorough Compensation Risk Assessment:Assessment: Our compensation committee conducts an annual assessment of our compensation programs to promote prudent risk management.
•Compensation Committee Independence and Experience:Experience: Our compensation committee is comprised solely of independent directors who have extensive relevant experience.
•Independent Compensation Consultant:Consultant: Our compensation committee selects and engages its own independent advisors.
•Clawback Policy: Our policy on the recovery of incentive compensation allows us to recover certain cash or equity-based incentive compensation payments or awards made or granted to an executive officer subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16 of the Exchange Act in the event of misconduct that results in the need for us to prepare a material financial restatement or material restatement of certain operational results.
What we do not do:
•No Single TriggerSingle-Trigger Equity Vesting Acceleration:Acceleration: We do not provide for single triggersingle-trigger equity vesting acceleration upon a change of control.
No Special Perquisites: We do not provide special perquisites for executives.
•No Hedging or Pledging in Company Securities:Securities: Executives, directors and all employees are prohibited from engaging in any hedging or pledging transaction with respect to company equity securities.
•No Guaranteed Cash Bonuses:Bonuses: We do not provide guaranteed minimum bonuses.
•No Discounted Options /Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs)(“SARs”): We do not provide discounted stock options or SARs.
•No 280G Tax Gross-Ups:Gross-Ups: We do not provide tax gross-ups for “excess parachute payments.”
•No supplemental defined benefit pension plans: NEOs participate in the same retirement plans as all other employees. Design
In weighting our executive compensation program more heavily towards equity,2020, we typically awardawarded a combination of restricted stock unit (RSU)RSU and stock option (Option) grants to our executive officers, including our NEOs. We believe the combination of both RSUs and Option awards both alignaligns the interests of our executives with our stockholders and provide a focus on creating long-term shareholder value through a multi-year vesting schedule. The RSUs also help us manage dilution to existingof investors and provide our executive officers some predictabilitystability in the value of their compensation while still heavily incentivizing them to generate significant shareholder returns. The compensation committee believes that these equity awards serve as an effective retention tool for our executive officers, because unvested awards are generally forfeited if an executive officer voluntarily leaves us before the awards have vested.
Typically, equity awards for our NEOs are granted in February or March of the reporting year. The size of these awards is not determined based on a specific formula, but rather through the exercise of the compensation committee’s judgment after considering the individual performance of each of the executive officers, our strategic goals, the recommendations of our CEO and Executive Chairman (except with respect to her and his respective individual awards), the appropriate level of compensation for the position given the scope of responsibility and any changes, the need to hire or retain an individual in a particular position, the current unvested equity held by such individual and related vesting schedules, the impact of dilution to our shareholders, the level of each executive officer’s total target cash compensation (base salary plus target cash incentive opportunity), executive leadership factors, and the perceived retentive value of the proposed awards.
To maintain a competitive compensation program, we also offerprovide cash compensation in the form of base salaries that are intended to provide a stable level of fixed compensation to our executive officers, including our NEOs, for performance of their day-to-day responsibilities and an annual cashbonus incentive that is intended to incentivize achievement of our short-term performance goals. The total cash compensation for our executive officers has historically been low relative to companies in our peer group and broader market practices.
Compensation Setting Process
Pursuant to its charter and in accordance with applicable Nasdaq listing standards, our compensation committee is responsible for reviewing, evaluating, and approving the compensation arrangements of our executive officers and for establishing and maintaining our executive compensation policies and practices. Our compensation committee seeks input and receives recommendations from its independent compensation consultant as well as members of our executive management team when discussing the performance and compensation of other executive officers, and in determining the financial and accounting implications of our compensation programs
and hiring decisions. The compensation committee is authorized to engage its own independent advisors to provide advice on matters related to executive compensation and general compensation programs, and for 20182020, worked with Meridian as its independent compensation consultant. For additional information on the compensation committee, see “Committees of the Board of Directors -Compensation– Compensation Committee” elsewhere in this proxy statement. The initial compensation arrangements with our executive officers, other than our CEOChief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman, were the result of arm’s-length negotiations between us and each individual executive officer at the time of his or her hire or appointment.
In 2018,2020, the compensation committee considered numerous factors in determining whether to make adjustments to the cashbase salary levels, target bonus opportunities and equity compensation of our executive officers, includinggrants to our NEOs. The compensation committee reviewed the performance of our executive officers, taking into consideration financial, operational, customer, strategic, product, and competitive factors, as well as the succession planning and retention objectives for our various executive officer positions. The compensation committee also considered our published peer group and data from the Radford Global Technology Survey for our CEOChief Executive Officer and CFO,Chief Financial Officer, and only the Radford Global Technology Survey as the primary source for all other executives, including our other NEOs, because of the broader availability of data points.
Except with respect to our CEO’sChief Executive Officer’s compensation, our CEOChief Executive Officer made recommendations to the compensation committee regarding the compensation for our executive officers, which was also taken into account by the compensation committee in making its decisions regarding executive compensation. Our CEOChief Executive Officer was not present for the discussions of our compensation committee regarding her performance and compensation. Following deliberation, the compensation committee approved the cash compensation and equity awards for each of our NEOs as described below and in the Summary Compensation Table.
Consideration of Say-on-Pay Vote and Shareholder Feedback
The compensation committee also considered the results of the annual advisory “say-on-pay” vote and shareholder feedback. At our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, our “say-on-pay” proposal received a substantial majority (97%) of votes cast. In consideration of this vote and feedback from our shareholders through our outreach efforts, the compensation committee approved an executive compensation program structure for 2020 that is unchanged from the 2019 program.
Compensation Governance
Compensation Recovery Policy (“Clawback Policy”)
The Compensation Committee has adopted a policy that grants the Board the authority to demand the repayment of any performance-based cash or equity compensation paid to our current or former executive officers where the payments were predicated upon the achievement of financial results that results in either (i) the Company being required to restate due to the material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws or (ii) the Company’s restatement of operational results due to a material error, and in either case, it is determined that the current or former executive officer’s misconduct contributed to such error. This policy applies to current and former executive officers subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16 of the Exchange Act who were involved in the misconduct, and the amount that is required to be repaid is the amount erroneously paid or earned in excess of what would have been paid or earned under the accounting restatement. In addition to the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are subject to the compensation recovery provisions of Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Hedging and Pledging Prohibition
Our insider trading policy prohibits our executive officers, directors, employees and consultants from purchasing our securities on margin, borrowing against any account in which our securities are held or pledging our securities as collateral for any purpose. Our insider trading policy also prohibits such individuals from engaging in any hedging transaction with respect to our securities.
Role of Management
The role of management is to design our executive compensation programs, policies, and governance and make recommendations to the compensation committee regarding these matters. In this respect, management reviews the effectiveness of our compensation programs, including competitiveness and alignment with Sunrun’s performance goals. Management also recommends changes to our compensation programs to facilitate achievement of our performance goals and reviews and makes recommendations with respect to the adoption and approval of, or modifications to, company-wide equity incentive compensation plans. Our CEOChief Executive Officer makes compensation recommendations to the compensation committee with respect to base salaries, cash incentive awards, equity incentive awards, and other awards for our executive officers, including our NEOs, other than the CEO.Chief Executive Officer.
Role of the Compensation Consultant
The compensation committee retained Meridian to advise on our 20182020 executive compensation programs, practices and decisions given Meridian’s expertise in the technology industry and its knowledge of our peer group companies.
During 2018,2020, Meridian provided the following services as requested by the compensation committee:
•Assisted in the development of the 20182020 compensation peer group and analyzed the Radford Technology Survey data we review to assess overall market competitive compensation practices;
•Reviewed and assessed our compensation practices and the cash and equity compensation levels of our executive officers (including an analysis of the effectiveness of our equity incentive program as a retention tool and an analysis of the cost of our change in control benefits in relation to market practices), including our NEOs;tool);
•Reviewed and assessed our current compensation programs and identified certain changes for the compensation committee’s consideration to potentially implement in order to remain competitive with the market, as well as conducted an equity burn rate and overhang analysis; and
Reviewed and assessed our current NEO severance and change in control benefits against peer practices; and
•Advised on regulatory developments relating to executive compensation, and collaborated on the risk assessment relating to employee compensation.
All other analyses related to setting executive compensation for 2018 were conducted internally. Internal analyses included gathering and analyzing data and reviewing and advising on the key components of executive compensation. Base salaries, equity awards, and cash bonuses were among the items reviewed based on market data provided by Meridian. During 2018,2020, the compensation committee reviewed the fees providedpaid to Meridian relative to Meridian’s revenues, the services provided by Meridian to the compensation committee, any relationships between Meridian and its individual consultants and our executive officers, any stock ownership of Sunrun by Meridian, and other factors relating to Meridian’s independence, andindependence. The compensation committee concluded that Meridian is independent within the meaning of the Nasdaq listing standards and that its engagement did not present any conflictconflicts of interest.
Compensation Peer Group
With the assistance of Meridian, our compensation committee selected our primary compensation peer group which we used for our 20182020 compensation decisions. The compensation peer group was generally developed from companies with a focus on renewable energy,
direct-to-consumer software/services, fintech, and leasing companies. As mentioned above, the Company competes with an array of industries to attract and retain talent. We selected publicly-traded, stand-alone companies which at the time the peer group was selected in February 2017 had at least three years’ of trading history, revenues at levels 1/4x
to 4x Sunrun’s revenues of approximately $600$844 million (i.e., a range of $150$215 million to $2.4$3.4 billion) and a market cap between 1/4x and 4x Sunrun’s market capitalization of approximately $1.4$1.97 billion (i.e., a range of $345$490 million to $5.5$7.9 billion).
Our primary compensation peer group for 20182020 consisted of the following companies:
•First Solar, Inc.Aircastle Limited
•Plug Power, Inc.Air Lease Corporation
•GogoAlarm.com Holdings, Inc.
•Enova International Inc.
•Air Lease Corp.Enphase Energy
•SunpowerFirst Solar, Inc.
•Generac Holdings Inc.
•Gogo Inc.
•Green Dot Corporation
•Fuelcell EnergyJ2 Global, Inc.
•Control 4 Corp.LendingClub Corporation
•Lendingclub Corp.LendingTree, Inc.
•Aircastle Ltd.Sunnova Energy International Inc.
•SunPower Corporation
•Vivint Solar, Inc.
•Pandora Media Inc.
•Greed Dot Corp.
•On Deck Capital Inc.
•TAL International Group Inc.
•Silver Springs Networks, Inc.
Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program
The key elements of our executive compensation program include base salary, annual cashbonus incentive awards, equity-basedequity awards, and health, welfare and retirement programs. Except with respect to annual cashbonus incentive plan awards, which typically are expressed as a pre-determinedpredetermined percentage of each executive officer’s base salary, we do not use specific formulas or weightings in determining the allocation of the various pay elements.
20182020 Compensation Decisions
For 20182020, the compensation committee conducted its regular annual review of our executive compensation program, including an evaluationprogram. With the support of its independent consultant as well as management (where appropriate), the compensation committee evaluated competitive market practices; conducted annual performance reviews for our executive officers; determined whether to make adjustments to our executive officers’ base salaries and target annual bonus opportunities; and granted annual equity awards. Following deliberationAs noted above, the compensation committee and considerationmanagement agreed to a change in compensation philosophy beginning with 2020 pay decisions for the NEOs. More specifically, base salary, target bonus opportunities and annual long-term incentive grant values will now be targeted within a competitive range of the factors discussed below, our board of directors and compensation committee50th percentile. It was determined that equity awards, including prior grants, should continuethis adjustment was appropriate due to be a significant portionboth the competitive nature of executive compensation, and that cash compensation (including base salary and bonuses) should remain lower relative toopportunities in the Company’s market norms. Accordingly, our NEO’s 2018 base salary and bonus targets were set at a level belowfor talent as well as the median of our peer group.Company’s maturity.
Base Salary
For 2018, the compensation committee reviewed the base salaries of our NEOs,In March 2020, after considering a compensation analysis performed by Meridian and other factors listed above in the Compensation Setting Process section, the compensation committee determined to maintain each of their annualthat the base salaries of Ms. Jurich, Mr. Dawson, and Mr. Komin continued to be at levels below the 2017 levels,median of our peer group such that increases were warranted to remain relatively competitive with our peers. In particular, the exception of an increase incompensation committee determined that Ms. Steele’sJurich’s 2019 base salary, thatwhich was below the median CEO’s base salary for our peer group did not appropriately reflect our rapid growth and status as the market leader in residential solar energy. Accordingly, the compensation committee approved the following increases to the base salaries of our named executive officers, which became effective in May 20182020. The Compensation Committee also approved Mr. vonReichbauer’s compensation in recognitionconnection with his appointment as Chief Financial Officer in May 2020, and the Board of her promotionDirectors approved Mr. Bywater’s base salary in July 2020 (effective upon the closing of the Vivint Solar acquisition in October 2020).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Executive | | 2020 Base Salary | | % Increase |
Lynn Jurich | | $ | 800,000 | | | +33% |
Tom vonReichbauer | | $ | 440,000 | | | n/a |
Edward Fenster | | $ | 540,000 | | | 0% |
Chris Dawson | | $ | 440,000 | | | +10% |
David Bywater (1) | | $ | 660,000 | | | n/a |
Bob Komin | | $ | 440,000 | | | +4% |
(1) Mr. Bywater joined the Company as Chief Executive Officer of Vivint Solar effective as of the closing of our acquisition of Vivint Solar on October 8, 2020. Mr. Bywater’s base salary was agreed to pursuant to the roleemployment offer letter agreement we entered into with him in connection with our acquisition of General Counsel. The 2018 annualVivint Solar.
Temporary Base Salary Reductions Due to COVID-19
In response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the members of our executive team voluntarily agreed to temporarily reduce their base salary levelssalaries for the period from April 6, 2020 through May 17, 2020.During this period, Ms. Jurich and applicable percentage of any increase fromMr. Fenster reduced their salaries by 99% and our other named executive officers at the 2017 base salary levels is set forth in the chart below.time agreed to reduce their salaries by 40%.
|
| | | | | | |
Executive | 2018 Base Salary | | % Increase |
Lynn Jurich, Chief Executive Officer | $ | 500,000 |
| | 0 | % |
Edward Fenster, Executive Chairman | $ | 450,000 |
| | 0 | % |
Bob Komin, Chief Financial Officer | $ | 350,000 |
| | 0 | % |
Jeanna Steele, General Counsel | $ | 285,000 |
| (1) | +35 | % |
Christopher Dawson, Chief Operating Officer | $ | 350,000 |
| | 0 | % |
Paul Winnowski, former President | $ | 350,000 |
| | 0 | % |
______________________
| |
(1) | Ms. Steele's base salary increase became effective on May 20, 2018 in connection with her appointment to the role of General Counsel. |
Annual CashBonus Incentive Plan Awards
Sunrun Annual Bonus Incentive Plan Awards
Our executive officers are eligible to participate in our 20182020 annual cashbonus incentive plan available to key employees, referred to as our Annual Incentive Plan. The 20182020 target annual bonus opportunity for each of our NEOs was set as a percentage of his or her base salary, as provided in the chart below,table below. Such percentages were increased for Ms. Jurich and Mr. Dawson from the 2019 levels from 100% to 125% and 75% to 80%, respectively, because the compensation committee determined that such target bonus levels did not appropriately reflect desired market positioning and the rapid growth of the company’s operations and customer-base. Such percentages were not changed from the 2017 levelsfor our other NEOs because the compensation committee determined that such target bonus levels continued to be appropriate. appropriate (except with respect to Mr. vonReichbauer who was not employed by the Company in 2019). The 2018 planAnnual Incentive Plan provided the opportunity for our NEOs to earn up to 200% of their stated target bonus, provided the Company delivered performance that met or exceeded maximum performance goals. Conversely, no annual cashbonus incentive award will bewould have been paid unless Company performance meetsmet or exceedsexceeded threshold performance goals.
|
| | | | | | |
Executive | 2018 Target Bonus | | % Base Salary |
Lynn Jurich, Chief Executive Officer | $ | 500,000 |
| | 100 | % |
Edward Fenster, Executive Chairman | $ | 360,000 |
| | 80 | % |
Bob Komin, Chief Financial Officer | $ | 280,000 |
| | 80 | % |
Jeanna Steele, General Counsel | $ | 142,500 |
| | 50 | % |
Christopher Dawson, Chief Operating Officer | $ | 262,500 |
| | 75 | % |
Paul Winnowski, former President(1) | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Executive (1) | | 2020 Target Bonus | | % Base Salary |
Lynn Jurich | | $ | 1,000,000 | | | 125 | % |
Tom vonReichbauer (2) | | $ | 352,000 | | | 80 | % |
Edward Fenster | | $ | 432,000 | | | 80 | % |
Chris Dawson | | $ | 352,000 | | | 80 | % |
| | | | |
______________________(1)Mr. Komin is not included in the table above because he resigned effective May 11, 2020 and, as a result, was not eligible to receive a 2020 annual bonus. With respect to Mr. Bywater, see “Vivint Solar Annual Bonus Incentive Plan Awards” for a description of Mr. Bywater’s 2020 bonus.
| |
(1)(2)Mr. vonReichbauer’s target full-year target bonus is reflected above; however, because he joined the Company in May 2020, he was only eligible for a pro-rated bonus in 2020.
| Pursuant to the terms of his Transition, Separation and General Release Agreement described below, Mr. Winnowski was not eligible to earn any 2018 performance bonus. |
The performance goals for our Annual Incentive Plan are set each year by our compensation committee.
For 2018,2020, the compensation committee selected three key performance criteria to balance top-line growth with structural cash flow generation and customer experience related goals. Accordingly, the 20182020 corporate performance criteria selected were: Total MW Deployed, Cash Generation, and Operational. Based upon our level of achievement against the performance goal targets, the Committeecompensation committee awarded each NEO a bonus award amount calculated based solely on the cumulative percentage of attainment of the three target goals. While the compensation committee ultimately retainsretained discretion to modify the bonus award amount for any individual participant up or down (based on factors such as, but not limited to, the participant’s individual performance), the compensation committee chose to not modify any NEO’s bonus award for 20182020 performance.
2018
2020 Annual Incentive Plan Metrics
|
| | | | |
Goal | Weighting |
Megawatts Deployed: The total aggregate megawatt production capacity of our solar energy systems, whether sold directly to customers or subject to executed Customer Agreements (i) for which we have (i) confirmation that the systems are installed on the roof, subject to final inspection orinspection; (ii) in the case of certain system installations by our partners, for which we have accrued at least 80% of the expected project cost, or (iii) for multi-family and any other systems that have reached NTP, measured on the percentage of the project that has been completed based on expected project cost. (NTP or Notice to Proceed refers to our internal confirmation that a solar energy system has met our installation requirements for size equipment and design.) | 40% |
Cash Generation: The change in consolidated total cash balance (including restricted cash) less any increases in recourse debt balances, and adjusted for one-time items. | 40% |
Operational: Customer experience related goals tied to our mission statement and business plan. | 20% |
We consider these specific target performance goals to be confidential commercial and financial information, the disclosure of which could result in competitive harm to us. The target performance goals were set by the compensation committee in February 2020; however, given the impacts of COVID-19 on the solar industry and the broader economy, the compensation committee adjusted such targets in August 2020. Examples of COVID-19 impacts that rendered the original performance goal targets obsolete include various state and local executive orders, shelter-in-place orders, quarantines, and similar government orders that limited and/or prevented our field sales and installations for portions of the year. These factors significantly impacted the residential solar industry generally, and without adjustment to our performance goal targets, these factors would have made achieving the original performance goals unfeasible. As adjusted, the target performance goals remained set at aggressive levels intended to be very challenging to attain.attain during the remainder of the year. The revised targets established by the Compensation Committee were intended to require significant operational agility and for the Company to accelerate our transition to a more digital sales-focused model. Our actual cumulative attainment of the three performance goals was 67%103%.
Accordingly, the Annual Incentive Plan bonus awards paid to our NEOs for 20182020 performance were approved and awardedin February 2021 at a level equal to 67%103% of their target bonus awards.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Executive | | Actual Bonus Value | | % of Target Bonus |
Lynn Jurich | | $ | 1,030,000 | | | 103% |
Tom vonReichbauer(1) | | $ | 239,725 | | | 103% |
Edward Fenster | | $ | 444,960 | | | 103% |
Chris Dawson | | $ | 362,560 | | | 103% |
| | | | |
(1)Mr. vonReichbauer’s bonus reflects a prorated portion of his target 2020 bonus, as he joined the Company in May 2020.
Vivint Solar Annual Bonus Incentive Plan Awards
Mr. Bywater participated in Vivint Solar’s 2020 annual bonus incentive plan, which was established prior to our acquisition of Vivint Solar in October 2020. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement with Vivint Solar, we were required to maintain and continue Vivint Solar’s 2020 annual bonus incentive plan with the same terms in effect immediately prior to completion of the acquisition, including the determination made by Vivint Solar’s board of directors prior to completion of the acquisition that 2020 bonuses would be paid at 125% of target level. Mr. Bywater received a bonus of $816,750 in January 2021 in connection with the payout of the Vivint Solar 2020 annual bonus incentive plan, which represented a payout equal to 125% of Mr. Bywater’s target bonus.
Equity Awards
Each of our NEOs were granted equity-based awards exceptin the form of RSUs and Options. The size of these awards was not determined based on a specific formula, but rather through the exercise of the compensation committee’s judgment after considering the individual performance of each of the executive officers, our strategic goals, the recommendations of our CEO and Executive Chairman (except with respect to her and his respective individual awards), the appropriate level of compensation for the position given the scope of responsibility and any changes, the current unvested equity held by such individual and related vesting schedules, the impact of dilution to our shareholders, the level of each executive officer’s total target cash compensation (base salary plus target cash incentive opportunity), executive leadership factors, and the perceived retentive value of the proposed awards.
Based on the foregoing consideration, the compensation committee approved the following annual equity awards for our named executive officers in 2020:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Executive | | Options | | RSUs | | Target Equity Value |
Lynn Jurich | | 246,609 | | 128,626 | | $4,000,000 |
Tom vonReichbauer (1) | | 316,012 | | 195,823 | | $4,500,000 |
Edward Fenster | | 154,131 | | 80,392 | | $2,500,000 |
David Bywater (2) | | 76,858 | | 39,600 | | $4,500,000 |
Chris Dawson | | 86,313 | | 45,019 | | $1,400,000 |
Bob Komin | | 67,818(3) | | 35,372(3) | | $1,100,000 |
(1)Mr. Winnowski,vonReichbauer joined the Company in May 2020. Mr. vonReichbauer’s equity awards were the result of arm’s-length negotiations at the time he was hired.
(2)Mr. Bywater joined the Company as set forthChief Executive Officer of Vivint Solar. effective as of the closing of our acquisition of Vivint Solar on October 8, 2020. Mr. Bywater’s equity awards were granted pursuant to the employment offer letter agreement we entered into with him in connection with our acquisition of Vivint Solar.
(3)Awards forfeited in connection with Mr. Komin’s separation from the Company.
Due to significant COVID-19 market impacts, the Company experienced in March 2020, the proxy-required grant date fair value of our executives' annual equity awards described in the table below.above fell below the target equity value. Our award process entails the use of an average closing price over a specified period of time prior to grant, and the abrupt decline of the market in March 2020 in connection with the spread of COVID-19 resulted in the grant date value of such awards falling below the target equity value.
Additional 2020 Equity Usage
|
| | | | | | |
Executive | Actual Bonus | | % of Target Bonus |
Lynn Jurich, Chief Executive Officer | $ | 335,000 |
| | 67 | % |
Edward Fenster, Executive Chairman | $ | 241,000 |
| | 67 | % |
Bob Komin, Chief Financial Officer | $ | 188,000 |
| | 67 | % |
Jeanna Steele, General Counsel | $ | 73,000 |
| | 67 | % |
Christopher Dawson, Chief Operating Officer | $ | 176,000 |
| | 67 | % |
Paul Winnowski, former President(1) | $ | — |
| | N/A |
|
______________________
| |
(1) | Pursuant to the terms of his Transition, Separation and General Release Agreement described below, Mr. Winnowski was not eligible to earn any 2018 performance bonus. |
Equity-Based Awards
For 2018 we did not grant any additional equity awards to Ms. Jurich or Mr. Fenster becauseOn May 8, 2020, the compensation committee determinedapproved a one-time supplemental grant of fully vested RSUs to employees who were adversely impacted by a disproportionately large sell-to-cover withholding tax event that their current unvested equity award levelsoccurred on a day when COVID-19-related news impacted markets in March 2020. Ms. Jurich and Messrs. Fenster, Dawson, and Komin were at sufficient levelseach part of the impacted group of over 350 employees and as a result, received 25,533, 19,912, 10,023, and 11,437 RSUs, respectively.
On May 13, 2020, the compensation committee approved the payout of the 2019 bonus plan to continue to provide retentionall employee bonus recipients in the form of fully vested RSUs in lieu of cash. Ms. Jurich and performance incentives. We did not grant any additional equity awards to Mr.Messrs. Fenster, Dawson, and Komin received 42,342, 30,477, 21,171, and 23,963 RSUs, respectively. The payout of the bonus plan in 2018 because he had received his initial new hire equity award grants on December 15, 2017 withRSUs was a total grant value of approximately $3 million. Mr. Winnowski did not receive any 2018 equity grants due to his expected termination of employment in April 2018 and because he was not eligible to receive such awards under the terms of his Transition, Separation and General Release Agreement described below. Ms. Steele received equity awards both during the regular annual award process and additional equity awards in June 2018one-time event made in connection with her promotion to General Counsel.other cash conservation strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic. The target cash value of such awards was previously disclosed in our proxy statement filed on April 17, 2020.
The
2021 Compensation Philosophy
For 2021, the key elements of our executive compensation program will include the existing components of base salary, annual cash bonus incentive awards, time-based equity awards, grantedand health, welfare and retirement programs, as well as the introduction of performance-based equity awards. The performance-based equity awards will be multi-year awards tied to Mr. Kominour achievement of certain synergies related to our acquisition of Vivint Solar and Ms. Steele in 2018 were as follows:performance targets measured by Total Value Generated. We believe that providing a portfolio of performance-based equity awards, time-based equity awards, and cash compensation supports the objectives of our long-term incentive compensation program by further aligning the interests of our executive officers and stockholders, balancing performance and retention considerations, and enabling us to use our equity compensation resources more efficiently.
|
| | | | | | |
Executive | | Options | | RSUs | Total Equity Value | % of Total Direct Compensation |
Bob Komin, Chief Financial Officer | | 100,000 | | 100,000 | $1,310,040 | 71% |
Jeanna Steele, General Counsel | | 92,000 | | 41,600 | $979,876 | 74% |
Benefits Programs and Perquisites
Our employee benefit programs, including our 401(k) plan,plans, employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”), and health and welfare programs, including health savings accounts and flexible spending arrangements, are designed to provide a competitive level of benefits to our employees generally, including our executive officers and their family members including spouses, qualifying domestic partners and children. We adjust our employee benefit programs as needed based upon regular monitoring of applicable laws and practices and the competitive market. Our executive officers are eligible to participate in the same employee benefit plans and programs, and on the same terms and conditions, as all other U.S. full-time employees. Commencing in 2018 ourThe Sunrun 401(k) plan provides for employer matching contributions of 100% of the first 1% of compensation and 50% of the next 5% of compensation deferred under the plan. Contributions made by employees in ourthe Sunrun 401(k) plan are immediately vested while matching contributions made by the Company are 100% vested after two years of service.
Currently, we do not view perquisites or other personal benefits as a significant component of our executive compensation program. Accordingly, we do not generally provide perquisites to our executive team.
Severance and Change in Control Benefits
Paul Winnowski Termination, Separation and General Release Agreement
In December 2017, in connection with his resignation as Chief Operating Officer, we entered into a Termination, Separation and General Release Agreement with Paul Winnowski referred to as the “Separation Agreement”. The Separation Agreement provides that Mr. Winnowski would continue to be employed with the Company as President until April 1, 2018, to assist with the transition of his responsibilities, and would resign on such date. The Separation Agreement provides that Mr. Winnowksi would continue to earn his base salary during the transition employment period and would still be eligible to earn a bonus for 2017 performance, but not be eligible to earn any 2018 performance bonus. The Separation Agreement also provided that subject to Mr. Winnowki’s provision of services during the transition employment period and an effective release of claims at the end of such period, we would provide him with the following severance benefits:
Six months’ of base salary, payable in a lump sum;
A pro-rata cash bonus equal to the average aggregate of the cash bonuses paid to him for the two preceding years;
Accelerated vesting of 50% of his unvested options and restricted stock units;
An extended period of 24 months following his resignation date to exercise any vested options; and
Six months’ of COBRA premium reimbursements.
The compensation committee determined that these severance benefits were appropriate in order to induce Mr. Winnowski’s continued employment and provision of transition services during the transition period as well as consistent with those then available under our Key Employee Change in Control and Severance Plan, described below. Mr. Winnowski ceased to be eligible for benefits under the Severance Plan when he entered into the Separation Agreement.
Post-Employment Compensation
Severance Plan. In August 2018, we adopted a Key Employee Change in Control and Severance Plan, referred to as our “Severance Plan”,Plan,” applicable to our executive officers and certain other employees, whichother than Mr. Bywater, whose benefits upon a change in control are described below. The Severance Plan provides for severance payments and benefits in the event of a qualifying termination of employment.The Severance Plan was adopted due to the automatic expiration of our predecessor severance benefit plan which occurred in May 2018.
The following benefits are provided under the Severance Plan to in connection with any termination without cause or good reason that occurs other than within three months prior to, or 12 months following, a change in control (as defined in the Severance Plan):
•12 months of base salary and COBRA premiums (Ms. Jurich and Mr. Fenster) or six months of base salary and COBRA premiums (Messrs. KominvonReichbauer and Dawson, and Ms. Steele)Dawson);
•A pro-rata bonus amount based on the average bonus payable to such individual for the prior two years, or if none, a pro-rata portion of the target bonus in the year of termination; and
•50% equity vesting acceleration.
The following benefits are provided under the Severance Plan to Ms. Jurich and Mr. Fenster in connection with any termination without cause or good reason resignation that occurs within three months prior to, or 12 months following, a change in control:
•18 months of base salary and COBRA premiums;
•150% target annual cash bonus;
•100% equity vesting acceleration; and
•18 months post-termination exercise period for options.
The following benefits are provided under the Severance Plan to Messrs. KominvonReichbauer and Dawson and Ms. Steele in connection with any termination without cause or good reason that occurs other than within three months prior to, or 12 months following, a change in control:
•12 months of base salary and COBRA premiums;
•100% target annual bonus;
•100% equity vesting acceleration; and
•12 months post-termination exercise period for options.
The Severance Plan benefits were approved by the compensation committee after considering the level of benefits provided under the predecessor severance plan and reviewing competitive market data for our peer group. The compensation committee determined that these benefits were both competitively reasonable and necessary to recruit and retain key executives. Enhanced severance benefits are provided for a qualifying termination that occurs in connection with a change-in-control because the severance benefits are also intended to eliminate, or at least reduce, the reluctance of our executive officers to diligently consider and pursue potential change-in-control transactions that may be in the best interests of our shareholders.
2019 Base Salary and Bonus Target Changes
Bywater Offer Letter. In March 2019 the compensation committee analyzed our cash compensation practices in relation to our peer group and determined that our NEO base salaries continued to be at levels well below the median of our peer group such that increases were warranted to remain relatively competitiveconnection with our peers. Accordingly,acquisition of Vivint Solar, we entered into an employment offer letter with Mr. Bywater. Under the compensation committee approvedterms of his offer letter, Mr. Bywater agreed to serve as the following increasesChief Executive Officer of Vivint Solar for a 12-month transition period, the duration of which period may be adjusted as mutually agreed in writing between Mr. Bywater and Sunrun. During the first six months of the transition period, Mr. Bywater will be a full-time employee, and during the second six months of the transition period, Mr. Bywater will be a part-time employee, unless at any time during such period he elects to change his status to that of a non-employee advisor. Mr. Bywater’s offer letter further provides that, upon the first anniversary of completion of the acquisition or a termination of Mr. Bywater’s employment either at expiration of his 12-month transition period for any reason or, prior to the base salariesexpiration of all our named executive officers, with the exceptionstransition period, by us without “cause”, by Mr. Bywater for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in his offer letter) or due to Mr. Bywater’s death or disability, Mr. Bywater will receive cash severance in the amount of $2,565,528, plus a pro-rata bonus for the year of termination based on the same percentage rate as his 2020 bonus and his actual salary paid for the year of termination. In addition, Mr. Winnowski, which became effective on April 7, 2019:
|
| | | | | | | |
Executive | | 2019 Base Salary | | | % Increase |
Lynn Jurich, Chief Executive Officer | | $ | 600,000 |
| | | 20.0% |
Edward Fenster, Executive Chairman | | $ | 540,000 |
| | | 20.0% |
Bob Komin, Chief Financial Officer | | $ | 425,000 |
| | | 21.4% |
Jeanna Steele, General Counsel | | $ | 335,000 |
| | | 17.5% |
Christopher Dawson, Chief Operating Officer | | $ | 400,000 |
| | | 14.3% |
Additionally,Bywater will be entitled to reimbursement of his COBRA premiums for up to 18 months, or if such reimbursements would result in March 2019 Ms. Steele’s 2019 bonus target was increased from 50%an excise tax, a lump sum payment of $36,000 in lieu of such reimbursements. In addition, Mr. Bywater would be entitled to 75% to reflect her increased responsibilitiesthe acceleration of 100% of any unvested and outstanding Vivint Solar equity award that we assumed in connection with her prior year promotionthe acquisition, 100% of the retention equity awards granted pursuant to General Counsel.his offer letter, and 100% any equity awards that we granted to Mr. Bywater in 2020. Mr. Bywater’s receipt of the severance benefits is subject to his execution and non-revocation of a release of claims in favor of us.
Consistent with our historic compensation practices, following the implementation of these base pay and target bonus increases, our NEO’s 2019 base salary and bonus targets are still set at level below the median of our peer group.
Other Compensation Policies
Equity Awards Grant Policy
The compensation committee has adopted a policy governing equity awards that are granted to our executive officers and employees and members of our board of directors. This policy provides that all equity awards will be granted either by our board of directors or the compensation committee at a meeting or by unanimous written consent, subject to equity award guidelines adopted by our board of directors. The exercise price of all stock options and SARs must be equal to or greater than the closing trading price of our common stock on the date of grant.
Insider Trading Policy
Our Insider Trading Policyinsider trading policy prohibits our employees, including our executive officers, non-employee directors and consultants from engaging in short sales, transactions in put or call options, hedging transactions or other inherently speculative transactions with respect to our securities at any time. In addition, no officer, director, other employee or consultant may margin any of our securities, including without limitation, pledging or borrowing against such securities, at any time. Our Insider Trading Policyinsider trading policy encourages our executive officers and members of our board of directors to adopt plans in accordance with Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1 for sales of securities that they beneficially own, and provides that such individuals may not otherwise trade in our equity securities during “blackout” periods.
Compensation Policies and Practices as theyThey Relate to Risk Management
The compensation committee has reviewed our executive and employee compensation programs and does not believe that our compensation policies and practices encourage undue or inappropriate risk taking or create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. The reasons for the compensation committee’s determination include the following:
•We structure our compensation program to consist of both fixed and variable components. The fixed (or base salary) component is designed to provide income independent of our stock price performance so that employees will not focus exclusively on stock price performance to the detriment of other important business metrics. The equity component of our compensation program is intended to discourage employees from taking actions that focus only on our short-term success and helps align our employees with our stockholders and on our longer-term success. Our employee equity-based awards have time-based vesting, generally over a period of four years. A significant portion of the compensation paid to our executive officers and the members of our board of directors is in the form of equity with time-based vesting.
•We maintain internal controls over the measurement and calculation of financial information, which are designed to prevent this information from being manipulated by any employee, including our executive officers.
•While we do not cap the cash incentive award for our sales incentive plans to provide maximum incentive for our sales teams to meet and exceed their objectives, we do maintain internal controls over the determination of sales incentive awards, which allowsallow us to ensure that we are awarding only those sales people who operate with absolute integrity, and we believe helpssuch internal controls help to prevent problematic behaviors.
•Our employees are required to comply with our Codecode of Business Conductbusiness conduct and Ethics,ethics, which covers, among other things, accuracy in financial and business records keeping. Further, our sales teams are also subject to a specific Sales Codesales code of Conductconduct which we believe enforces customer-centered behaviors including compliance with all consumer protection laws and fosters a culture of absolute integrity in our employees.
•As part of our policies on trading in securities, we prohibit hedging and pledging transactions involving our securities so that our executive officers, employees, non-employee directors and other employeesconsultants cannot insulate themselves from the effects of poor stock price performance.
Tax and Accounting Considerations
Limitation on Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 162(m)”), compensation paid to any publicly-held corporation’seach of our “covered employees” that exceeds $1 million per taxable year for any such individual is generally non-deductible.
However, Section 162(m) provides a reliance period exception, pursuant to whichnon-deductible unless the deduction limit under Section 162(m) does not apply to anycompensation qualifies for (i) certain grandfathered exceptions (including the “performance-based compensation” exception) for certain compensation paid (or in certain cases, granted) during a certain reliance period pursuant to a planwritten binding contract in effect on November 2, 2017 and not materially modified on or agreement that existed prior to the corporation’s initial public offering, subject to certain requirements. Under Section 162(m), this reliance period ends upon the earliest of the following: (i) the expiration of the planafter such date or agreement; (ii) the material modification of the plan or agreement; (iii) the issuance of all employer stock and other compensation that has been allocated under the plan; or (iv) the first meeting of stockholders at which directors are to be elected that occurs after the close of the third calendar year following the calendar year in which the initial public offering occurs. However, the reliance period exception under Section 162(m) may be repealed or modified in the future as a result offor certain changes that were made to Section 162(m) pursuant to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
Compensation paid to each of the Company’s “covered employees” in excess of $1 million per taxable year generally will not be deductible unless it qualifies for the reliance period exception under Section 162(m). Because of certain ambiguities and uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Section 162(m), as well as other factors beyond the control of the compensation committee, no assurance can be given that any compensation paid by the Company will qualify for the reliance period exception under Section 162(m) and be deductible by the Company in the future. corporations that became publicly held on or before December 20, 2019.
Although the compensation committee will continue to consider tax implications as one factor in determining executive compensation, the compensation committee also looks at other factors in making its decisions and retains the flexibility to provide compensation for the Company’sour named executive officers in a manner consistent with the goals of the Company’sour executive compensation program and the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, which may include providing for compensation that is not deductible by the Company due to the deduction limit under Section 162(m). The compensation committee also retains the flexibility to modify compensation that was initially intended to be exempt from the deduction limit under Section 162(m) if it determines that such modifications are consistent with the Company’s business needs.
No Tax Reimbursement of Parachute Payments and Deferred Compensation
We did not provide any executive officer, including any NEO, with a “gross-up” or other reimbursement payment for any tax liability that he or she might owe as a result of the application of Sections 280G, 4999, or 409A of the Code during 20182020, and we have not agreed and are not otherwise obligated to provide any NEO with such a “gross-up” or other reimbursement.tax reimbursement (other than the tax reimbursement payments for vehicle-related and travel expenses that we provide to Mr. Bywater).
Accounting Treatment
We account for stock compensation in accordance with the authoritative guidance set forth in ASC Topic 718, which requires companies to measure and recognize the compensation expense for all share-based awards made to employees and directors, including stock options, RSU awards and shares acquired through our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”),ESPP, over the period during which the award recipient is required to perform services in exchange for the award (for executive officers, generally the four-year vesting period of the award). We estimate the fair value of stock options and shares acquired through our ESPP using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. This calculation is performed for accounting purposes and reported in the compensation tables below.
Compensation Committee Report
The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement with management and, based on such review and discussions, the compensation committee recommended to our board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be incorporated by reference in Sunrun’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 20182020 and included in this proxy statement.
Submitted by the compensation committee of our board of directors:
Katherine August de-Wilde (Chairwoman)(Chair)
Mary Powell
Steve Vassallo
Alan Ferber
Fiscal 20182020 Summary Compensation Table
The following table presents summary information regarding the total compensation for services rendered in all capacities that was earned by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2018.2020.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | | Year | | Salary ($) | | Bonus ($) | | Option Awards (1) ($) | | Stock Awards (2) ($) | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (3) ($) | | All Other Compensation ($) | | Total ($) |
Lynn Jurich, CEO | | 2018 | | 500,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 335,000 |
| | 9,625 |
| | 844,625 |
|
| | 2017 | | 500,000 |
| | — |
| | 2,509,500 |
| | 2,080,000 |
| | 500,000 |
| | — |
| | 5,589,500 |
|
| | 2016 | | 473,077 |
| | — |
| | 1,180,770 |
| | 1,333,500 |
| | 424,052 |
| | — |
| | 3,411,399 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bob Komin, Chief Financial Officer(4) | | 2018 | | 350,000 |
| | — |
| | 460,040 |
| | 850,000 |
| | 187,600 |
| | 9,625 |
| | 1,857,265 |
|
| | 2017 | | 350,000 |
| | — |
| | 1,028,895 |
| | 875,000 |
| | 266,875 |
| | — |
| | 2,520,770 |
|
| | 2016 | | 336,538 |
| | — |
| | 421,704 |
| | 1,349,500 |
| | 195,675 |
| | 350 |
| | 2,303,767 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Edward Fenster, Chairman | | 2018 | | 450,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 241,200 |
| | 9,625 |
| | 700,825 |
|
| | 2017 | | 450,000 |
| | — |
| | 1,586,004 |
| | 1,300,000 |
| | 360,000 |
| | — |
| | 3,696,004 |
|
| | 2016 | | 436,539 |
| | — |
| | 1,124,542 |
| | 1,270,000 |
| | 323,119 |
| | — |
| | 3,154,200 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Chris Dawson, Chief Operating Officer (5) | | 2018 | | 350,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 175,875 |
| | 9,625 |
| | 535,500 |
|
| | 2017 | | 10,769 |
| | — |
| | 1,416,700 |
| | 1,515,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,942,469 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jeanna Steele, General Counsel (6) | | 2018 | | 256,123 |
| | — |
| | 516,656 |
| | 463,220 |
| | 73,000 |
| | 9,625 |
| | 1,318,624 |
|
| | 2017 | | 209,494 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 29,000 |
| | 41,897 |
| | — |
| | 280,391 |
|
| | 2016 | | 203,462 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 268,133 |
| | 44,460 |
| | 350 |
| | 516,405 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Paul Winnowski, former President(7) | | 2018 | | 88,846 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,984,094 |
| | 2,072,940 |
|
| | 2017 | | 350,000 |
| | — |
| | 1,028,895 |
| | 875,000 |
| | 297,500 |
| | — |
| | 2,551,395 |
|
| | 2016 | | 339,231 |
| | — |
| | 478,431 |
| | 539,750 |
| | 302,198 |
| | — |
| | 1,659,610 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | | Year | | Salary ($) | | Bonus ($) | | Option Awards (1) ($) | | Stock Awards (2)(3) ($) | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (4) ($) | | All Other Compensation (5) ($) | | Total ($) |
Lynn Jurich, Chief Executive Officer | | 2020 | | 677,823 | | — | | | 1,275,782 | | | 2,212,254 | | | 1,030,000 | | 7,134 | | | 5,202,993 |
| | 2019 | | 569,231 | | — | | | 2,131,294 | | | 2,148,259 | | | 573,311 | | 9,800 | | | 5,431,895 |
| | 2018 | | 500,000 | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 335,000 | | 9,625 | | | 844,625 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tom vonReichbauer Chief Financial Officer (6) | | 2020 | | 284,646 | | 100,000 | | | 2,397,962 | | | 2,628,924 | | | 239,725 | | — | | | 5,651,257 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Edward Fenster, Executive Chairman | | 2020 | | 499,122 | | — | | | 797,366 | | | 1,495,404 | | | 444,960 | | 7,270 | | | 3,244,122 |
| | 2019 | | 512,308 | | — | | | 1,539,268 | | | 1,551,530 | | | 412,659 | | 9,800 | | | 4,025,565 |
| | 2018 | | 450,000 | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 241,000 | | 9,625 | | | 700,625 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
David Bywater, former Chief Executive Officer of Vivint Solar, Inc. (7) | | 2020 | | 165,000 | | — | | | 2,250,179 | | | 2,250,072 | | | 816,750 | | 21,073 (8) | | 5,503,074 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Chris Dawson, Chief Operating Officer | | 2020 | | 424,308 | | — | | | 446,523 | | | 876,331 | | | 362,560 | | 9,975 | | | 2,119,698 |
| | 2019 | | 384,615 | | — | | | 568,342 | | | 572,863 | | | 286,655 | | 9,800 | | | 1,822,275 |
| | 2018 | | 350,000 | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 176,000 | | 9,625 | | | 535,625 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bob Komin, former Chief Financial Officer (9) | | 2020 | | 178,154 | | — | | | 350,843 | | | 840,383 | | | — | | | 6,665 | | | 1,376,045 |
| | 2019 | | 401,923 | | — | | | 663,071 | | | 668,355 | | | 324,459 | | 9,800 | | | 2,067,608 |
| | 2018 | | 350,000 | | — | | | 460,040 | | | 850,000 | | | 188,000 | | 9,625 | | | 1,857,665 |
______________________
| |
(1) | The amounts reported in the Options Awards column represent the grant date fair value of the stock options granted to the named executive officers during 2018, 2017 and 2016 as computed in accordance with ASC 718. The assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value of the stock options reported in the Option Awards column are set forth in our consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.(1) The amounts reported in the Options Awards column represent the grant date fair value of the stock options granted to the named executive officers during 2020, 2019 and 2018 as computed in accordance with ASC 718. The assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value of the stock options reported in the Option Awards column are set forth in our consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. Note that amounts reported in this column reflect the accounting cost for these option awards, and do not correspond to the actual economic value that may be received by the named executive officers from the stock options. |
| |
(2) | The amounts reported in the Stock Awards column represent the grant date fair value of the stock awards granted to the named executive officers during 2018, 2017 and 2016 as computed in accordance with ASC 718. Note that the amounts reported in the column reflect the accounting cost for these stock awards, and do not correspond to the actual economic value that may be received by the named executive officers from the stock awards. |
| |
(3) | The amounts in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column for 2016 represent the amounts earned and payable under the 2016 bonus plan, all of which were paid in 2017. The amounts reported for 2017 represent the amounts earned and payable under the 2017 bonus plan, all of which were paid in 2018. The amounts reported for 2018 represent the amounts earned and payable under the 2018 bonus plan, all of which will be paid in 2019. Our board of directors formally adopted an Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) for our executives in December 2014. Under our AIP, our compensation committee retains discretionary authority to modify final bonus payouts for any one executive up or down based on the compensation committee’s assessment of that executive's overall individual performance. |
| |
(4) | All of our employees, including our named executive officers, are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan. The amounts shown for each named executive officer for 2018 reflect matching contributions made to each of our named executive officers in 2018 with our 401(k) applicable to all employees and as described elsewhere in this proxy statement. |
| |
(5) | Mr. Dawson joined the Company as Chief Operating Officer effective December 6, 2017. |
| |
(6) | Ms. Steele was appointed the Company’s General Counsel effective May 18, 2018. |
| |
(7) | Mr. Winnowski’s employment terminated on April 1, 2018. Per the terms of his severance agreement, Mr. Winnowski was eligible for certain severance and benefits payments. The amount reflected in “All Other Compensation” for Mr. Winnowski reflects the aggregate value of his cash severance, the value of his health and welfare benefits, payout of accrued but unused paid time off, and the fair market value of modifications made to his outstanding equity awards as computed with ASC 718. Specific terms of Mr. Winnowski’s severance benefits can be found in our Form 8-K filed on December 6, 2017. |
(2) The amounts reported in the Stock Awards column represent the grant date fair value of the stock awards granted to the named executive officers during 2020, 2019 and 2018 as computed in accordance with ASC 718. Note that the amounts reported in the column reflect the accounting cost for these stock awards, and do not correspond to the actual economic value that may be received by the named executive officers from the stock awards.
(3) Our named executive officers received fully vested RSUs in lieu of cash bonuses under the 2019 bonus plan, which RSUs were granted in May 2020. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amount of the actual bonuses awarded is reported in the above Summary Compensation Table under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column for 2019, and the value of RSUs is also included in 2020 under the column “Stock Awards.”
(4) The amounts in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column for 2018 represent the amounts earned and payable under the 2018 bonus plan, all of which were paid in 2018.The amounts reported for 2019 represent the amounts earned and payable under the 2019 bonus plan, all of which were paid in May 2020 in the form of fully vested RSUs.The amounts reported for 2020 represent the amounts earned and payable under the 2020 bonus plan, all of which were paid in March 2021. Our board of directors formally adopted an Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) for our executives in December 2014.Under our AIP, our compensation committee retains discretionary authority to modify final bonus payouts for any one executive up or down based on the compensation committee’s assessment of that executive’s overall individual performance.
(5) All of our employees, including our named executive officers, are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plans.The amounts shown for 2020 for each named executive officer, other than Messrs. vonReichbauer and Bywater, reflect matching contributions made to each of our named executive officers in 2020 with our 401(k) applicable to all employees and as described elsewhere in this proxy statement.
(6) Mr. vonReichbauer joined the Company in May 2020.
(7) Mr. Bywater joined the Company in October 2020. He ceased to serve as Chief Executive Officer of Vivint Solar and became a Company advisor in April 2021.
(8) Includes (a) $9,131 for the use of a company vehicle (including fuel and insurance) in 2020, and $6,996 as tax reimbursement payments relating to such expenses and (b) $3,000 for travel and lodging, and $1,946 as tax reimbursement payments relating to such expenses.
(9) Mr. Komin resigned as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer effective May 11, 2020 and served as a consultant to the Company until January 1, 2021.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 20182020
The following table presents, for each of our named executive officers, information concerning grants of plan-based awards made during fiscal 2018.2020. This information supplements the information about these awards set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Grant Date | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units | All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/sh) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards($)(2) |
Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) |
Lynn Jurich | — | — | | 1,000,000 | | 2,000,000 | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
Stock Option | 3/30/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 246,609 | | — | | 9.81 | | 1,275,782 | |
RSU | 3/30/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 128,626 | | — | | — | | 1,261,821 | |
RSU(3) | 5/8/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 25,533 | | — | | — | | 377,122 | |
RSU(4) | 5/13/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 42,342 | | — | | — | | 573,311 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Tom vonReichbauer (5) | — | — | | 225,666 | | 451,332 | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
Stock Option | 5/4/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 316,012 | | — | | 13.425 | | 2,397,962 | |
RSU | 5/4/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 195,823 | | — | | — | | 2,628,924 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Edward Fenster | — | — | | 432,000 | | 864,000 | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
Stock Option | 3/30/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 154,131 | | — | | 9.81 | | 797,366 | |
RSU | 3/30/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 80,392 | | — | | — | | 788,646 | |
RSU(3) | 5/8/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 19,912 | | — | | — | | 294,100 | |
RSU(4) | 5/13/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 30,477 | | — | | — | | 412,659 | |
| | | | | | | | |
David Bywater (6) | — | — | | 816,750 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
Stock Option | 10/21/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 76,858 | | — | | 56.82 | | 2,250,179 | |
RSU | 10/21/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 39,600 | | — | | — | | 2,250,072 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Chris Dawson | — | — | | 352,000 | | 704,000 | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
Stock Option | 3/30/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 86,313 | | — | | 9.81 | | 446,523 | |
RSU | 3/30/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 45,019 | | — | | — | | 441,636 | |
RSU(3) | 3/30/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 10,023 | | — | | — | | 148,040 | |
RSU(4) | 3/30/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 21,171 | | — | | — | | 286,655 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Bob Komin (7) | — | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
Stock Option | 3/30/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 67,818 | | — | | 9.81 | | 350,843 | |
RSU | 3/30/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 35,372 | | — | | — | | 346,999 | |
RSU(3) | 5/8/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 11,437 | | — | | — | | 168,924 | |
RSU(4) | 5/13/2020 | — | | — | | — | | 23,963 | | — | | — | | 324,459 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Grant Date | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units | All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/sh) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards($)(2) |
Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) |
Lynn Jurich | — |
| — |
| 500,000 | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Bob Komin | — |
| — |
| 280,000 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Stock Option | 4/13/2018 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 100,000 |
| — |
| — |
| 850,000 |
|
RSU | 4/13/2018 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 100,000 |
| 8.50 |
| 460,040 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Edward Fenster | — |
| — |
| 360,000 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Chris Dawson | — |
| — |
| 262,500 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Jeanna Steele | — |
| — |
| 142,500 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Stock Option | 3/20/2018 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 45,000 |
| 8.05 |
| 169,848 |
|
RSU | 3/20/2018 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 18,600 |
| — |
| — |
| 149,730 |
|
Stock Option | 6/15/2018 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 47,000 |
| 13.63 |
| 346,808 |
|
RSU | 6/15/2018 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 23,000 |
| — |
| — |
| 313,490 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Paul Winnowski | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
______________________
| |
(1) | (1) Amounts in the “Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards” columns relate to cash incentive compensation opportunities under our 2014 Annual Incentive Plan. The actual amounts paid to our named executive officers are set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table” above, and the calculation of the actual amounts paid is discussed more fully in “Executive Compensation-Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Annual Incentive Plan Awards” above. |
| |
(2) | The amounts reported in this column represent the grant date fair value of the stock options or RSUs, as applicable, granted to the named executive officers during 2018 as computed in accordance with ASC 718. Note that the amounts reported in the column reflect the accounting cost for these stock awards, and do not correspond to the actual economic value that may be received by the named executive officers from the stock options or RSUs. |
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2018
The following table sets forth the number of shares acquired and the value realized upon the exercise of stock options and the vesting of RSUs during fiscal 2018 by each of our named executive officers.officers are set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table” above, and the calculation of the actual amounts paid is discussed more fully in “Executive Compensation-Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Annual Incentive Plan Awards” above.
(2) The amounts reported in this column represent the grant date fair value of the stock options or RSUs, as applicable, granted to the named executive officers during 2020 as computed in accordance with ASC 718. Note that the amounts reported in the column reflect the accounting cost for these stock awards, and do not correspond to the actual economic value that may be received by the named executive officers from the stock options or RSUs.
|
| | | | | | | |
Name | Option Awards | Stock Awards |
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value of Realization on Vesting ($)(1) |
Lynn Jurich | 276,205 |
| 2,114,198 |
| 247,625 | 2,540,784 |
|
Bob Komin | — |
| — |
| 212,493 | 2,234,386 |
|
Edward Fenster | 50,000 |
| 426,500 |
| 176,250 | 1,816,050 |
|
Chris Dawson | — |
| — |
| 62,500 | 813,750 |
|
Jeanna Steele | — |
| — |
| 19,637 | 207,960 |
|
Paul Winnowski | — |
| — |
| 32,547 | 240,033 |
|
(3) On May 8, 2020, the compensation committee approved a one-time supplemental grant of fully vested RSUs to employees who were adversely impacted by a disproportionately large sell-to-cover withholding tax event that occurred on a day when COVID-19-related news impacted markets in March 2020. Ms. Jurich and Messrs. Fenster, Dawson, and Komin were each part of the impacted group of over 350 employees and as a result, received 25,533, 19,912, 10,023, and 11,437 RSUs, respectively.
(4) On May 13, 2020, the compensation committee approved the payout of the 2019 bonus plan to all employee bonus recipients in the form of fully vested RSUs in lieu of cash. Ms. Jurich and Messrs. Fenster, Dawson, and Komin received 42,342, 30,477, 21,171, and 23,963 RSUs, respectively. The payout of the bonus plan in RSUs was a one-time event made in connection with other cash conservation strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic.
______________________
| |
(1) | The value realized on vesting is calculated by multiplying the number of shares of stock by the market value of the underlying shares on the applicable vesting date. |
(5) Mr. vonReichbauer’s bonus opportunity is prorated, as he joined the Company in May 2020.
(6) Mr. Bywater received a bonus of $816,750 in January 2021 in connection with the payout of the Vivint Solar 2020 annual bonus incentive plan, which represented a payout equal to 125% of Mr. Bywater’s target bonus. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement with Vivint Solar, we were required to maintain and continue Vivint Solar’s 2020 annual bonus incentive plan with the same terms in effect immediately prior to completion of the acquisition, including the determination made by Vivint Solar’s board of directors prior to completion of the acquisition that 2020 bonuses would be paid at 125% of target level. (7) Mr. Komin resigned as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer effective May 11, 2020 and served as a consultant to the Company until January 1, 2021.
Executive Employment Agreements
Lynn Jurich
We have entered into a confirmatory employment letter with Lynn Jurich, our Chief Executive Officer. The confirmatory employment letter, dated May 12, 2015, has no specific term and provides for at-will employment. At December 31, 2018,2020, Ms. Jurich’s annual base salary was $500,000,$800,000, and she was eligible for annual target incentive payments equal to 100%125% of her base salary.
Tom vonReichbauer
We have entered into an employment offer letter with Tom vonReichbauer, our Chief Financial Officer. The offer letter, dated April 17, 2020, has no specific term and provides for at-will employment. At December 31, 2020, Mr. vonReichbauer’s annual base salary was $440,000, and he was eligible for annual target incentive payments equal to 80% of his base salary.
Edward Fenster
We have entered into a confirmatory employment letter with Edward Fenster, our Chairman. The confirmatory employment letter, dated May 12, 2015, has no specific term and provides for at-will employment. At December 31, 2020, Mr. Fenster’s annual base salary was $540,000, and he was eligible for annual target incentive payments equal to 80% of his base salary.
David Bywater
We have entered into an employment offer letter with David Bywater, the former Chief Executive Officer of Vivint Solar, in connection with our acquisition of Vivint Solar. Under the terms of his offer letter, Mr. Bywater will serve as the Chief Executive Officer of Vivint Solar for a 12-month transition period, the duration of which period may be adjusted as mutually agreed in writing between Mr. Bywater and us. In April 2021, Mr. Bywater ceased to serve as Chief Executive Officer of Vivint Solar and became a Company advisor. During the first six months of the transition period, Mr. Bywater will be a full-time employee, and during the second six months of the transition period, Mr. Bywater will be a part-time employee, unless at any time during such period he elects to change his status to that of a non-employee advisor. During the transition period, Mr. Bywater’s annualized base salary will be $660,000, prorated based on the number of hours worked during the part-time portion of the transition period. Mr. Bywater’s offer letter also provides that he will have a target bonus of 99% of his base salary, which will be prorated based on the applicable prorated base salary payable during the part-time portion of the transition period. Mr. Bywater is also provided with the use of a leased company vehicle, a gas card paid by us, a tax gross-up payment for car-related expenses, and an individual excess employee liability insurance policy.
Chris Dawson
We have entered into an employment offer letter to Chris Dawson, our Chief Operating Officer. The offer letter, dated November 13, 2017, has no specific term and provides for at-will employment. At December 31, 2018,2020, Mr. Dawson’s annual base salary was $350,000, and he was eligible for annual target incentive payments equal to 75% of his base salary.
Edward Fenster
We have entered into a confirmatory employment letter with Edward Fenster, our Chairman. The confirmatory employment letter, dated May 12, 2015, has no specific term and provides for at-will employment. At December 31, 2018, Mr. Fenster’s annual base salary was $450,000,$440,000, and he was eligible for annual target incentive payments equal to 80% of his base salary.
Bob Komin
We have entered into a confirmatory employment lettertransition agreement with BobMr. Komin ourdated April 22, 2020 pursuant to which Mr. Komin resigned as Chief Financial Officer. The confirmatory employment letter, dated May 12, 2015, has no specific termOfficer, and provides for at-will employment. At December 31, 2018, Mr. Komin’s annual base salary was $350,000, and he was eligible for annual target incentive payments equalcontinued to 80% of his base salary.serve as a consultant until January 1, 2021.
We have entered into a letter agreement with Jeanna Steele, our General Counsel. The letter agreement, dated May 15, 2018, has no specific term and provides for at-will employment. At December 31, 2018, Ms. Steele’s annual base salary was $285,000, and she was eligible for annual target incentive payments equal to 50% of her base salary.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table provides information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers at December 31, 2018.2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Option Awards | | Stock Awards |
Name | | Grant Date | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | | Option Exercise price ($) | | Option Expiration Date | | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | | Market Value of shares of Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (17) ($) |
Lynn Jurich | | 4/11/2014 (1) | | 225,988 | | | — | | | 5.88 | | | 4/10/2024 | | — | | | — | |
| | 2/11/2016 (1) | | 23,513 | | | — | | | 5.08 | | | 2/10/2026 | | — | | | — | |
| | 3/15/2017 (2) | | 937,489 | | | 62,511 | | | 5.00 | | | 3/14/2027 | | — | | | — | |
| | 3/15/2017 (3) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 26,000 | | | 1,803,880 | |
| | 3/14/2019 (4) | | 118,029 | | | 151,755 | | | 14.57 | | | 3/13/2029 | | — | | | — | |
| | 3/14/2019 (5) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 82,938 | | | 5,754,238 | |
| | 3/30/2020 (6) | | — | | | 246,609 | | | 9.81 | | | 3/29/2030 | | — | | | — | |
| | 3/30/2020 (7) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 128,626 | | | 8,924,072 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tom vonReichbauer | | 5/4/2020 (8) | | — | | | 316,012 | | | 13.425 | | | 5/3/2030 | | — | | | — | |
| | 5/4/2020 (9) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 195,823 | | | 13,586,200 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Edward Fenster | | 4/12/2013 (1) | | 216,372 | | | — | | | 3.19 | | | 4/11/2023 | | — | | | — | |
| | 4/11/2014 (1) | | 390,000 | | | — | | | 5.88 | | | 4/10/2024 | | — | | | — | |
| | 2/11/2016 (1) | | 550,600 | | | — | | | 5.08 | | | 2/10/2026 | | — | | | — | |
| | 3/15/2017 (2) | | 442,493 | | | 39,507 | | | 5.00 | | | 3/14/2027 | | — | | | — | |
| | 3/15/2017 (3) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 16,250 | | | 1,127,425 | |
| | 3/14/2019 (4) | | 85,243 | | | 109,601 | | | 14.57 | | | 3/13/2029 | | — | | | — | |
| | 3/14/2019 (5) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 59,900 | | | 4,155,862 | |
| | 3/30/2020 (6) | | — | | | 154,131 | | | 9.81 | | | 3/29/2030 | | — | | | — | |
| | 3/30/2020 (7) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 80,392 | | | 5,577,597 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
David Bywater | | 12/14/2016 (10) | | — | | | 8,808 | | | 5.19 | | | 12/13/2026 | | — | | | — | |
| | 12/14/2016 (10) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 6,181 | | 428,838 | |
| | 3/15/2018 (10) | | — | | | 41,716 | | | 5.73 | | | 3/14/2028 | | — | | | — | |
| | 3/15/2018 (10) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 27,281 | | 1,892,756 | |
| | 1/17/2019 (10) | | — | | | 143,761 | | | 7.59 | | | 1/16/2029 | | — | | | — | |
| | 1/17/2019 (10) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 92,738 | | 6,434,162 | |
| | 12/12/2019 (10) | | — | | | 76,219 | | | 14.10 | | | 12/11/2029 | | — | | | — | |
| | 12/12/2019 (10) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 44,354 | | 3,077,281 | |
| | 10/21/2020 (10) | | — | | | 42,867 | | | 56.82 | | | 10/20/2030 | | — | | | — | |
| | 10/21/2020 (10) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 22,000 | | 1,526,360 | |
| | 10/21/2020 (11) | | — | | | 33,991 | | | 56.82 | | | 10/20/2030 | | — | | | — | |
| | 10/21/2020 (12) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 17,600 | | 1,221,088 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Chris Dawson | | 12/15/2017 (13) | | 124,996 | | | 125,004 | | | 6.06 | | | 12/14/2027 | | — | | | — | |
| | 12/15/2017 (14) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 62,500 | | | 4,336,250 | |
| | 3/14/2019 (4) | | 31,474 | | | 40,468 | | | 14.57 | | | 3/13/2029 | | — | | | — | |
| | 3/14/2019 (5) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 22,117 | | | 1,534,477 | |
| | 3/30/2020 (6) | | — | | | 86,313 | | | 9.81 | | | 3/29/2030 | | — | | | — | |
| | 3/30/2020 (7) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 45,019 | | | 3,123,418 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Option Awards | | Stock Awards |
Name | | Grant Date | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | | Option Exercise price ($) | | Option Expiration Date | | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | | Market Value of shares of Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (21) ($) |
Lynn Jurich | | 6/16/2011 (1) | | 185,071 |
| | — |
| | 1.95 |
| | 6/15/2021 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 4/12/2013 (1) | | 303,500 |
| | — |
| | 3.19 |
| | 4/11/2023 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 4/11/2014 (1) | | 400,000 |
| | — |
| | 5.88 |
| | 4/10/2024 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 2/11/2016 (2) | | 438,785 |
| | 180,684 |
| | 5.08 |
| | 2/10/2026 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 2/11/2016 (3) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | 82,032 |
| | 893,328 |
|
| | 3/15/2017 (4) | | 437,497 |
| | 562,503 |
| | 5.00 |
| | 3/14/2027 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 3/15/2017 (5) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | 234,000 |
| | 2,548,260 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Edward Fenster | | 6/16/2011 (1) | | 300,010 |
| | — |
| | 1.95 |
| | 6/15/2021 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 4/12/2013 (1) | | 303,500 |
| | — |
| | 3.19 |
| | 4/11/2023 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 4/11/2014 (1) | | 400,000 |
| | — |
| | 5.88 |
| | 4/10/2024 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 2/11/2016 (2) | | 417,891 |
| | 172,079 |
| | 5.08 |
| | 2/10/2026 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 2/11/2016 (3) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | 78,125 |
| | 850,781 |
|
| | 3/15/2017 (4) | | 276,498 |
| | 355,502 |
| | 5.00 |
| | 3/14/2027 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 3/15/2017 (5) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | 146,250 |
| | 1,592,663 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bob Komin | | 4/10/2015 (6) | | 550,000 |
| | — |
| | 9.17 |
| | 4/9/2025 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 4/10/2015 (7) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | 6,250 |
| | 68,063 |
|
| | 2/11/2016 (2) | | 156,709 |
| | 64,530 |
| | 5.08 |
| | 2/10/2026 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 2/11/2016 (3) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | 29,297 |
| | 319,044 |
|
| | 3/15/2017 (4) | | 179,373 |
| | 230,627 |
| | 5.00 |
| | 3/14/2027 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 3/15/2017 (5) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | 98,438 |
| | 1,071,990 |
|
| | 4/13/2018 (8) | | — |
| | 100,000 |
| | 8.50 |
| | 4/12/2028 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 4/13/2018 (9) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | 100,000 |
| | 1,089,000 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Chris Dawson | | 12/15/2017 (10) | | 125,000 |
| | 375,000 |
| | 6.06 |
| | 12/14/2027 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 12/15/2017 (11) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | 187,500 |
| | 2,041,875 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Paul Winnowski | | 2/1/2014 (12) | | 169,613 |
| | — |
| | 3.87 |
| | 10/7/2020 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 3/17/2014 (12) | | 100,000 |
| | — |
| | 5.88 |
| | 3/16/2024 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 2/11/2016 (13) | | 190,865 |
| | — |
| | 5.08 |
| | 2/10/2026 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 3/15/2017 (14) | | 256,250 |
| | — |
| | 5.00 |
| | 3/14/2027 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jeanna Steele | | 4/10/2015 (15) | | 18,750 |
| | 1,250 |
| | 9.17 |
| | 4/9/2025 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 2/11/2016 (3) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | 3,125 |
| | 34,031 |
|
| | 5/5/2016 (16) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | 5,625 |
| | 61,256 |
|
| | 3/15/2017 (5) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | 3,263 |
| | 35,534 |
|
| | 3/20/2018 (17) | | — |
| | 45,000 |
| | 8.05 |
| | 3/19/2028 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 3/20/2018 (18) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | 18,600 |
| | 202,554 |
|
| | 6/15/2018 (19) | | — |
| | 47,000 |
| | 13.63 |
| | 6/14/2028 | | — |
| | — |
|
| | 6/15/2018 (20) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | 23,000 |
| | 250,470 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bob Komin (18) | | 3/15/2017 (2) | | — | | | 25,630 | | | 5.00 | | | 3/14/2027 | | — | | | — | |
| | 3/15/2017 (3) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 10,938 | | | 758,878 | |
| | 4/13/2018 (15) | | — | | | 33,334 | | | 8.50 | | | 4/12/2028 | | — | | | — | |
| | 4/13/2018 (16) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 37,500 | | | 2,601,750 | |
| | 3/14/2019 (4) | | — | | | 47,213 | | | 14.57 | | | 3/13/2029 | | — | | | — | |
| | 3/14/2019 (5) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 25,803 | | | 1,790,212 | |
| | 3/30/2020 (6) | | — | | | 67,818 | | | 9.81 | | 3/29/2030 | | — | | | — | |
| | 3/30/2020 (7) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | 35,372 | | | 2,454,109 | |
______________________
(1)The stock option is fully vested and immediately exercisable.
| |
(2) | Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to the option vested on February 11, 2017 and one forty-eighth of the shares subject to the option vest monthly thereafter, subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement. |
| |
(3) | The RSUs vest over four years. Twenty-five percent of the RSUs vested on February 11, 2017 and the remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments thereafter subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement. |
| |
(4) | Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to the option vested on March 15, 2018 and one forty-eighth of the shares subject to the option vest monthly thereafter, subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement. |
| |
(5) | The RSUs vest over four years. Twenty-five percent of the RSUs vested on March 15, 2018 and the remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments thereafter subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement. |
| |
(6) | Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to the option vested on March 9, 2016 and one forty-eighth of the shares subject to the option vested monthly thereafter through December 31, 2016, subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement. Additionally, the compensation committee approved an "early exercise” feature with respect to 517,285 shares that may be exercised prior to vesting, subject to the Company’s right to repurchase the shares (at the exercise price) if Mr. Komin terminates employment prior to the vesting date(s). In connection with the November 8, 2016 grant described in Footnote (7) below, the compensation committee paused vesting of the remaining unvested shares subject to the option for the period January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2018, and 100% of those remaining unvested shares subject to the option vested on January 1, 2019, subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement. |
| |
(7) | The RSUs vest over four years. Twenty-five percent of the RSUs vested on March 9, 2016 and the remaining RSUs vest in equal monthly installments thereafter subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement. |
| |
(8) | Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to the option vest on April 1, 2019 and one forty-eighth of the shares subject to the option vest monthly thereafter, subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement. |
| |
(9) | The RSUs vest over four years. Twenty-five percent of the RSUs vest on April 1, 2019 and the remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments thereafter subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement. |
| |
(10) | Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to the option vested on December 15, 2018 and one forty-eighth of the shares subject to the option vest monthly thereafter, subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement. |
| |
(11) | The RSUs vest over four years. Twenty-five percent of the RSUs vested on December 15, 2018 and the remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments thereafter subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement. |
| |
(12) | The stock option is fully vested and immediately exercisable. Mr. Winnowski resigned as Chief Operating Officer in December 2017, at which time the award was subject to modification as described in the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 6, 2017. Additionally, the Board of Directors approved an “extended exercise period” for Mr. Winnowski’s option award. The amount shown reflects the number of shares subject to the option that are exercisable that were unexercised as of December 31, 2018. Mr. Winnowski resigned as President and his employment ceased on April 1, 2018. |
| |
(13) | Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to the option vested on February 11, 2017 and one forty-eighth of the shares subject to the option vested monthly thereafter, until Mr. Winnowski’s departure from the company in April 2018. Mr. Winnowski resigned as Chief Operating Officer in December 2017, at which time the award was subject to modification as described in the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 6, 2017. Additionally, the Board of Directors approved an “equity award acceleration” and an “extended exercise period” for Mr. Winnowski’s option award. The amount shown reflects the number of shares subject to the option that are exercisable that were unexercised as of December 31, 2018. Mr. Winnowski resigned as President and his employment ceased on April 1, 2018. |
| |
(14) | Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to the option vested on March 15, 2018 and one forty-eighth of the shares subject to the option vested monthly thereafter, until Mr. Winnowski’s departure from the company in April 2018. Mr. Winnowski resigned as Chief Operating Officer in December 2017, at which time the award was subject to modification as described in the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 6, 2017. Additionally, the Board of Directors approved an “equity award acceleration” and an “extended exercise period” for Mr. Winnowski’s option award. The amount shown reflects the number of shares subject to the option that are exercisable and unexercisable that were unexercised as of December 31, 2018. Mr. Winnowski resigned as President and his employment ceased on April 1, 2018. |
| |
(15) | Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to the option vested on March 9, 2016 and one forty-eighth of the shares subject to the option vest monthly thereafter, subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement. |
| |
(16) | The RSUs vest over four years. Twenty-five percent of the RSUs vested on May 5, 2017 and the remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments thereafter subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement. |
| |
(17) | Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to the option vest on March 15, 2019 and one forty-eighth of the shares subject to the option vest monthly thereafter, subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement. |
| |
(18) | The RSUs vest over four years. Twenty-five percent of the RSUs vest on March 15, 2019 and the remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments thereafter subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement. |
| |
(19) | Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to the option vest on June 15, 2019 and one forty-eighth of the shares subject to the option vest monthly thereafter, subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement. |
| |
(20) | The RSUs vest over four years. Twenty-five percent of the RSUs vest on June 15, 2019 and the remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments thereafter subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement. |
| |
(21) | This column represents the market value of the shares underlying the RSUs as of December 31, 2018, based on the closing price of our common stock, as reported on Nasdaq, of $10.89 per share on December 31, 2018. |
(2)Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to the option vested on March 15, 2018 and one forty-eighth of the shares subject to the option vest monthly thereafter, subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement.
(3)The RSUs vest over four years. Twenty-five percent of the RSUs vested on March 15, 2018 and the remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments thereafter subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement.
(4)Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to the option vested on March 15, 2020 and one forty-eighth of the shares subject to the option vest monthly thereafter, subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement.
(5)The RSUs vest over four years. Twenty-five percent of the RSUs vested on March 15, 2020 and the remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments thereafter subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement.
(6)Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to the option vested on March 30, 2021 and one forty-eighth of the shares subject to the option vest monthly thereafter, subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement.
(7)The RSUs vest over four years. Twenty-five percent of the RSUs vested on March 30, 2021 and the remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments thereafter subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement.
(8)Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to the option vest on May 4, 2021 and one forty-eighth of the shares subject to the option vest monthly thereafter, subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement.
(9)The RSUs vest over four years. Twenty-five percent of the RSUs vest on May 4, 2021 and the remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments thereafter subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement.
(10)The award is fully vested as of April 8, 2021. Award assumed in connection with acquisition of Vivint Solar, Inc., and vesting schedule modified from original terms upon assumption pursuant to the Company’s agreement with Mr. Bywater dated July 6, 2020.
(11)One hundred percent of the shares subject to the option vest on October 8, 2021, subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement. Award assumed in connection with acquisition of Vivint Solar, Inc., and vesting schedule modified from original terms upon assumption pursuant to the Company’s agreement with Mr. Bywater dated July 6, 2020.
(12)One hundred percent of the RSUs vest on October 8, 2021, subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement. Award assumed in connection with acquisition of Vivint Solar, Inc., and vesting schedule modified from original terms upon assumption pursuant to the Company’s agreement with Mr. Bywater dated July 6, 2020.
(13)Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to the option vested on December 15, 2018 and one forty-eighth of the shares subject to the option vest monthly thereafter, subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement.
(14)The RSUs vest over four years. Twenty-five percent of the RSUs vested on December 15, 2018 and the remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments thereafter subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement.
(15)Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to the option vested on April 1, 2019 and one forty-eighth of the shares subject to the option vest monthly thereafter, subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement.
(16)The RSUs vest over four years. Twenty-five percent of the RSUs vested on April 1, 2019 and the remaining RSUs vest in equal quarterly installments thereafter subject to continued service to us and subject to acceleration of vesting as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement.
(17)This column represents the market value of the shares underlying the RSUs as of December 31, 2020, based on the closing price of our common stock, as reported on Nasdaq, of $69.38 per share on December 31, 2020.
(18)Mr. Komin resigned as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer effective May 11, 2020 and served as a consultant to the Company until January 1, 2021.
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2020
The following table sets forth the number of shares acquired and the value realized upon the exercise of stock options and the vesting of RSUs during fiscal year 2020 by each of our named executive officers.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Option Awards | Stock Awards |
Name | | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | | Value Realized on Exercise ($) (1) | | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | | Value of Realization on Vesting ($) (2) |
Lynn Jurich | | 959,689 | | | 24,005,725 | | | 252,788 | | | 6,690,015 | |
Tom vonReichbauer | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Edward Fenster | | 286,498 | | | 14,256,112 | | | 177,602 | | | 4,573,692 | |
David Bywater | | 920,908 | | | 48,202,388 | | | 524,455 | | | 17,780,889 | |
Chris Dawson | | 250,000 | | | 13,839,045 | | | 110,895 | | | 3,165,973 | |
Bob Komin (3) | | 1,238,995 | | | 48,676,034 | | | 130,079 | | | 3,499,797 | |
______________________
(1)The value realized on exercise is pre-tax and represents the difference between the market price of the shares of the Company’s common stock underlying the options when exercised and the applicable exercise price.
(2)The value realized on vesting is calculated by multiplying the number of shares of stock by the market value of the underlying shares on the applicable vesting date.
(3)Mr. Komin resigned as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer effective May 11, 2020 and served as a consultant to the Company until January 1, 2021.
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control
The following table provides information concerning the estimated payments and benefits that would be provided in the circumstances described above for each of our NEOs. Payments and benefits are estimated assuming that the triggering event took place on the last day of fiscal year 2020 (December 31, 2020), and the price per share of our Common Stock was the closing price as of that date ($69.38 per share). These payments and benefits are in addition to benefits available generally to our salaried employees, such as distributions under Sunrun’s 401(k) plan.
There can be no assurance that a triggering event would produce the same or similar results as those estimated below if such event occurs on any other date or at any other price, or if any other assumption used to estimate the potential payments and benefits is different.
| | Name | Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason ($) | Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason in Connection with a Change in Control ($)(1) | Name | Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason ($) (1) | Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason in Connection with a Change in Control ($)(1) |
Lynn Jurich | | Lynn Jurich | |
Cash severance payments | 962,026 | 1,500,000 | Cash severance payments | 1,254,155 | | 2,700,000 | |
Continued health coverage | 22,812 | 34,218 | Continued health coverage | 23,397 | | 35,096 | |
Accelerated vesting | 3,902,252 | 7,804,505 | Accelerated vesting | 21,757,419 | | 43,514,838 | |
Total: | 4,887,090 | 9,338,723 | Total: | 23,034,971 | | 46,249,934 | |
| | |
Bob Komin | | |
Tom vonReichbauer | | Tom vonReichbauer | |
Cash severance payments | 406,275 | 630,000 | Cash severance payments | 572,000 | | 792,000 | |
Continued health coverage | 11,406 | 22,812 | Continued health coverage | 11,699 | | 23,397 | |
Accelerated vesting | 2,260,205 | 3,853,125 | Accelerated vesting | 15,634,326 | | 31,268,651 | |
Total: | 2,677,886 | 4,488,437 | Total: | 16,218,024 | | 32,084,048 | |
| | |
Edward Fenster | | Edward Fenster | |
Cash severance payments | 791,560 | 1,215,000 | Cash severance payments | 866,829 | | 1,458,000 | |
Continued health coverage | 22,812 | 34,218 | Continued health coverage | 23,397 | | 35,096 | |
Accelerated vesting | 2,768,565 | 5,537,130 | Accelerated vesting | 14,296,580 | | 28,593,159 | |
Total: | 3,582,936 | 6,786,348 | Total: | 15,186,806 | | 30,086,255 | |
| | |
David Bywater | | David Bywater | |
Cash severance payments | | Cash severance payments | 3,218,928 | | 3,218,928 | |
Continued health coverage | | Continued health coverage | 35,096 | | 35,096 | |
Accelerated vesting | | Accelerated vesting | 60,093,208 | | 60,093,208 | |
Total: | | Total: | 63,347,232 | | 63,347,232 | |
| Chris Dawson | | Chris Dawson | |
Cash severance payments | 437,500 | 612,500 | Cash severance payments | 451,328 | | 792,000 | |
Continued health coverage | 11,406 | 22,812 | Continued health coverage | 11,699 | | 23,397 | |
Accelerated vesting | 1,926,563 | 3,853,125 | Accelerated vesting | 12,134,558 | | 24,269,115 | |
Total: | 2,375,469 | 4,488,437 | Total: | 12,597,584 | | 25,084,512 | |
| | |
Jeanna Steele | | |
Cash severance payments | 218,179 | 459,000 | |
Continued health coverage | 11,406 | 22,812 | |
Accelerated vesting | 356,898 | 713,795 | |
Total: | 586,482 | 1,195,607 | |
| | |
Paul Winnowski | | |
Severance payment(1) | 1,984,094 | |
Total: | 1,984,094 | |
______________________
| |
(1) | The values listed in the table for Mr. Winnowski reflect the lump sum payment to him under his Separation Agreement as described in this proxy statement. |
(1)Any cash severance payments payable under our Severance Plan (applicable to Ms. Jurich and Messrs. vonReichbauer, Fenster, and Dawson) in connection with a termination without cause or good reason resignation not related to a change in control are generally paid over the applicable severance benefit period, which is 12 months for Ms. Jurich and Mr. Fenster and six months for Messrs. KominvonReichbauer and Dawson, and Ms. Steele, unless the Company elects in its discretion to pay such amounts in a single lump sum. Any cash severance benefits payable under our Severance Plan in connection with a change in control related termination are paid in a single lump sum. In order to receive the severance benefits, the NEO must sign and not revoke a release of claims in our favor within the timeframe set forth in the Severance Plan. For a description of Mr. Winnowski’s cashBywater’s severance benefits were payable in a single lump sum in consideration for a release of claims as provided in his Separation Agreement. For more information regardingand the potential payments upon termination or change of control described above, see the “Executive Compensation-Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Paul Winnowski Termination, Separation and General Release Agreement and Post-Employment Compensation” sections of this proxy statement. conditions thereto, please refer to “Bywater Offer Letter” below.
Severance Plan.We adopted a change in control and severance plan applicable to our executive officers and certain other key employees. employees (excluding Mr. Bywater, described further below).Under the plan, for the period from three months prior to until 12 months following a change in control (“change in control period”) if any plan participant is terminated for any reason other than cause, death or disability or a plan participant voluntarily resigns for good reason, the plan participant would be entitled to receive severance benefits.Lynn Jurich, Tom vonReichbauer, Edward Fenster, and Chris Dawson Bob Komin and Jeanna Steele are plan participants.Upon the occurrence of such an event, Ms. Jurich and Mr. Fenster are each entitled to receive the following severance benefits: (i) a lump sum cash amount equal to 18 months of theirhis or her then current annual base salary, (ii) a lump sum cash amount equal to 150% of theirhis or her target bonus amount for the fiscal year of termination, (iii) reimbursement of continued health coverage under COBRA or taxable lump sum payment in lieu of reimbursement, as applicable, for a period of 18 months following termination, and (iv) all unvested equity awards held by the plan participant immediately prior to such termination will become vested and exercisable in full.Upon the occurrence of the same such event, Mr.Messrs. vonReichbauer and Dawson isare each entitled to receive the following severance benefits: (i) a lump sum cash amount equal to 12 months of his or her then current annual base salary, (ii) a lump sum cash amount equal to 100% of his or her target bonus amount for the fiscal year of termination, (iii) reimbursement of continued health coverage under COBRA or taxable lump sum payment in lieu of reimbursement, as applicable, for a period of 12 months following termination, and (iv) all unvested equity awards held by Mr. Dawsonthe plan participant immediately prior to such termination will become vested and exercisable in full.
Further, under the policy, if, outside the change in control period, any plan participant is terminated for any reason other than cause, death or disability or, in the case of certain plan participants (including our named executive officers), a plan participant voluntarily resigns for good reason, the plan participant would be entitled to receive severance benefits.Upon the occurrence of such an event, Ms. Jurich and Mr. Fenster are each entitled to receive the following: (i) continuing payments of theirhis or her then current annual base salary for a period of 12 months following the termination date, (ii) a pro-ratedprorated amount of the average aggregate amount of the actual bonus payments paid to themhim or her during each of the two fiscal years immediately preceding the fiscal year of theirhis or her termination date and payable over a period of 12 months following the termination date, (iii) reimbursement of continued health coverage under COBRA or taxable lump sum payment in lieu of reimbursement, as applicable, for a period of 12 months following termination, and (iv) 50% of all unvested equity awards held by such plan participant immediately prior to such termination will become vested and exercisable in full. Upon the occurrence of the same such an event, Mr.Messrs. vonReichbauer and Dawson isare each entitled to receive the following: (i) continuing payments of thishis or her then current annual base salary for a period of six months following the termination date, (ii) a pro-ratedprorated amount of the average aggregate amount of the actual bonus payments paid to him or her during each of the two fiscal years immediately preceding the fiscal year of the termination date and payable over a period of six months following the termination date, (iii) reimbursement of continued health coverage under COBRA or taxable lump sum payment in lieu of reimbursement, as applicable, for a period of six months following termination, and (iv) 50% of all unvested equity awards held by Mr. Dawsonthe plan participant immediately prior to such termination will become vested and exercisable in full.
In order to receive the severance benefits, Ms. Jurich, Mr. vonReichbauer, Mr. Fenster, and/orMr. Bywater, and Mr. Dawson must sign and not revoke a release of claims in our favor within a specified timeframe.
Bywater Offer Letter.In connection with our acquisition of Vivint Solar, we entered into an employment offer letter with Mr. Bywater. Under the timeframe set forthterms of his offer letter, Mr. Bywater agreed to serve as the Chief Executive Officer of Vivint Solar for a 12-month transition period, the duration of which period may be adjusted as mutually agreed in writing between Mr. Bywater and Sunrun. During the first six months of the transition period, Mr. Bywater will be a full-time employee, and during the second six months of the transition period, Mr. Bywater will be a part-time employee, unless at any time during such period he elects to change his status to that of a non-employee advisor. Mr. Bywater’s offer letter further provides that, upon the first anniversary of completion of the acquisition or a termination of Mr. Bywater’s employment either at expiration of his 12-month transition period for any reason or, prior to the expiration of the transition period, by us without “cause”, by Mr. Bywater for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in his offer letter) or due to Mr. Bywater’s death or disability, Mr. Bywater will receive cash severance in the plan.amount of $2,565,528, plus a pro-rata bonus for the year of termination based on the same percentage rate as his 2020 bonus and his actual salary paid for the year of termination. In addition, Mr. Bywater will be entitled to reimbursement of his COBRA premiums for up to 18 months, or if such reimbursements would result in an excise tax, a lump sum payment of $36,000 in lieu of such reimbursements. In addition, Mr. Bywater would be entitled to the acceleration of 100% of any unvested and outstanding Vivint Solar equity award that we assumed in connection with the acquisition, 100% of the retention equity awards granted pursuant to his offer letter, and 100% any equity awards that we granted to Mr. Bywater in 2020. Mr. Bywater’s receipt of the severance benefits is subject to his execution and non-revocation of a release of claims in favor of us.
Pay Ratio Disclosure
We are providing below the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO, Lynn Jurich, to the annual total compensation of our median employee (excluding our CEO). For fiscal year 2020:
•Ms Jurich’s annual total compensation, as reported in the Fiscal 2020 Summary Compensation Table included elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, was $5,202,993;
•The annual total compensation of our median employee was $57,213; and
•The ratio of Ms. Jurich’s annual total compensation to the annual total compensation of our median employee was 91 to 1.
To identify our median employee, we took the following steps:
•We selected December 31, 2020, the last day of our 2020 fiscal year, as the determination date for purposes of identifying our median employee.
•As permitted by SEC rules, we determined to exclude our employees who were employed by Vivint Solar immediately prior to our acquisition of Vivint Solar on October 8, 2020, which as of December 31, 2020, was approximately 3,800 employees.
•We selected our median employee based on approximately 4,700 full-time, and part-time workers who were employed as of the determination date (excluding all employees of Vivint Solar).
•We selected our median employee using a compensation measure of total Federal taxable W-2 earnings for fiscal year 2020 that consists of cash compensation (base salary, hourly wages, overtime pay, and quarterly and annual incentive compensation) and other taxable earnings.
•We did not rely on the data privacy or de minimis exceptions pursuant to SEC rules. We also did not annualize compensation for any employees that were only employed for part of fiscal year 2020, nor did we use any cost-of-living adjustment.
•All employees except for our CEO were ranked from lowest to highest with the median determined from this list.
Once we identified our median employee, we determined that employee’s annual total compensation in the same manner that we calculate the total compensation of our CEO and other NEOs for purposes of the Summary Compensation Table. This annual total compensation amount for our median employee was then compared to the amount reported in the “Total” column for our CEO in the Fiscal 2020 Summary Compensation Table to determine the pay ratio.
The pay ratio reported above is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules, based on our internal records and the methodology described above. Because SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may use different methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table summarizes our equity compensation plan information as of December 31, 2018.2020. Information is included for equity compensation plans approved by our stockholders. We do not have any equity compensation plans not approved by our stockholders.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Plan Category | | (a) Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | | (b) Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options (5) ($) | | (c) Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a)) |
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders (1) | | 10,436,905 | (3) | $ | 9.70 | | | 17,009,131 |
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders (2) | | 4,329,496 | (4) | $ | 13.94 | | | 7,072,100 |
Total | | 14,766,401 | | | | 24,081,231 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Plan Category | | (a) Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | | (b) Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options (1) ($) | | (c) Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a)) |
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders | | 17,632,258 |
| (2) | 6.07 |
| (3) | 17,235,969 |
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
Total | | 17,632,258 |
| | 6.07 |
| | 17,235,969 |
______________________
| |
(1) | Includes the following plans: 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, 2009 Mainstream Energy Corporation ("MEC") Stock Plan, 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, 2015 Equity Incentive Plan ("2015 Plan"), and 2015 Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("2015 ESPP"). Our 2015 Plan provides that on January 1st of each fiscal year commencing in 2016 and ending on (and including) January 1, 2025, the number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2015 Plan is automatically increased by a number equal to the lesser of (i) 10,000,000 shares; (ii) 4% of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year, or; (iii) such other amount as our board of directors may determine. Our 2015 ESPP provides that on January 1st of each fiscal year commencing in 2016 and ending on (and including) January 1, 2035, the number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2015 ESPP is automatically increased by a number equal to the lesser of (i) 5,000,000 shares; (ii) 2% of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year; or (iii) such other amount as our board of directors may determine. We do not have any non-stockholder approved equity compensation plans. |
| |
(2) | This number includes 4,143,776(1) Includes the following plans: 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, Mainstream Energy Corporation (“MEC”) 2009 Stock Plan, 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (“2015 Plan”) and our ESPP. Our 2015 Plan provides that on January 1st of each fiscal year commencing in 2016 and ending on (and including) January 1, 2025, the number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2015 Plan is automatically increased by a number equal to the lesser of (i) 10,000,000 shares; (ii) 4% of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year, or; (iii) such other amount as our board of directors may determine. Our ESPP provides that on January 1st of each fiscal year commencing in 2016 and ending on (and including) January 1, 2035, the number of shares authorized for issuance under the ESPP is automatically increased by a number equal to the lesser of (i) 5,000,000 shares; (ii) 2% of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year; or (iii) such other amount as our board of directors may determine. (2) Includes the following plans which have been assumed by us in connection with our acquisition of Vivint Solar: the V Solar Holdings, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the Vivint Solar, Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”). The 2014 Plan provides that, on the first day of each fiscal year commencing in 2015 and ending in the fiscal year of the 2014 Plan’s termination in 2024, the number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2014 Plan is automatically increased by a number equal to the lesser of (i) 8,800,000 shares (or 4,840,000 shares, adjusted for the exchange ratio used to convert Vivint Solar stock awards into Sunrun stock awards in connection with the acquisition (the “exchange ratio”)); (ii) 4% of the total number of Vivint Solar shares outstanding on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year (which will equal the number of Vivint Solar shares outstanding immediately prior to the consummation of the acquisition, adjusted for the exchange ratio), or (iii) such other amount as our board of directors may determine. The material features of the 2014 Plan are set forth under Note 17 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. (3) This number includes 3,781,363 shares subject to RSUs. (4) This number includes 3,099,205 shares subject to RSUs. (5) The weighted average exercise price relates solely to outstanding stock option shares since shares subject to the RSUs have no exercise price.
|
| |
(3) | The weighted average exercise price relates solely to outstanding stock option shares since shares subject to the RSUs have no exercise price. |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our capital stock as of March 1, 20192021 for:
•each person or group of affiliated persons known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock;
•each of our named executive officers;
•each of our directors and nominees for director; and
•all of our current executive officers and directors as a group.
We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on information furnished to us, that the persons and entities named in the table below have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares of our capital stock that they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property laws.
Applicable percentage ownership is based on 114,104,874202,593,962 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 1, 2019.2021. In computing the number of shares of capital stock beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of such person, we deemed to be outstanding all shares of our capital stock subject to options held by the person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 20192021 and issuable upon the vesting of RSUs held by the person within 60 days of March 1, 2019.2021. However, we did not deem such shares of our capital stock outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner listed in the table below is c/o Sunrun Inc., 595 Market225 Bush Street, 29th Floor,Suite 1400, San Francisco, California 94105.94104. The information provided in the table is based on our records, information filed with the SEC and information provided to us, except where otherwise noted.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name of Beneficial Owner | | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | | Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned |
Named Executive Officers and Directors: | | | | |
Lynn Jurich (1) | | 4,228,765 | | | 2.1% |
Edward Fenster (2) | | 3,140,066 | | | 1.5% |
Tom vonReichbauer(3) | | — | | | * |
Chris Dawson (4) | | 278,601 | | | * |
Katherine August-deWilde (5) | | 100,875 | | | * |
Leslie Dach (6) | | 140,519 | | | * |
Alan Ferber (7) | | 23,940 | | | * |
Mary Powell (8) | | 39,041 | | | * |
Gerald Risk (9) | | 461,150 | | | * |
David Bywater (10) | | 601,490 | | | * |
Ellen Smith (11) | | 4,050 | | | * |
Sonita Lontoh | | — | | | * |
All executive officers and directors as a group (12 persons) (12) | | 9,110,285 | | | 4.4% |
5% Stockholders: | | | | |
Fidelity Management & Research Company (13) | | 29,629,547 | | | 14.6% |
BlackRock, Inc. (14) | | 23,631,994 | | | 11.7% |
Coatue Management LLC (15) | | 18,692,965 | | | 9.2% |
The Vanguard Group (16) | | 16,639,789 | | | 8.2% |
|
| | | | | | |
Name of Beneficial Owner | | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | | Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned |
Named Executive Officers and Directors: | | | | |
Lynn Jurich (1) | | 4,266,578 |
| | 3.74 | % |
Edward Fenster (2) | | 3,656,890 |
| | 3.20 | % |
Bob Komin (3) | | 1,222,623 |
| | 1.07 | % |
Chris Dawson (4) | | 225,455 |
| | * |
|
Jeanna Steele (5) | | 56,041 |
| | * |
|
Katherine August-deWilde (6) | | 114,935 |
| | * |
|
Leslie Dach (7) | | 183,470 |
| | * |
|
Alan Ferber (8) | | 15,101 |
| | * |
|
Mary Powell (9) | | 15,101 |
| | * |
|
Gerald Risk (10) | | 664,695 |
| | * |
|
Steven Vassallo (11) | | 236,800 |
| | * |
|
Paul Winnowski (12) | | 1,465,451 |
| | 1.28 | % |
All executive officers and directors as a group (11 persons) (13) | | 10,657,689 |
| | 9.34 | % |
5% Stockholders: | | | | |
Tiger Global Management, LLC (14) | | 17,817,199 |
| | 15.61 | % |
Fidelity Management & Research Company (15) | | 16,777,863 |
| | 14.70 | % |
The Vanguard Group (16) | | 7,995,213 |
| | 7.01 | % |
Sequoia Capital U.S. Growth Fund IV, L.P. (17) | | 7,517,960 |
| | 6.59 | % |
BlackRock, Inc. (18) | | 6,725,927 |
| | 5.89 | % |
______________________
| |
* | Represents beneficial ownership of less than one percent (1%) of the outstanding shares of our common stock. |
| |
(1) | Consists of (i) 2,329,367 shares held of record by Ms. Jurich, (ii) 1,894,804 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding stock options held by Ms. Jurich which are exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2019, and (iii) 42,407 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which will vest within 60 days of March 1, 2019. |
*Represents beneficial ownership of less than one percent (1%) of the outstanding shares of our common stock.
(1)Consists of (i) 1,184,592 shares held of record by Ms. Jurich, (ii) 1,600,000 shares held of record by Jurich Murray Holdings LLC, (iii) 1,376,801 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding stock options held by Ms. Jurich which are exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2021, and (iv) 67,372 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which will vest within 60 days of March 1, 2021.
| |
(2) | Consists of (i) 1,939,265 shares held of record by Mr. Fenster, (ii) 1,685,750 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding stock options held by Mr. Fenster which are exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2019, and (iii) 31,875 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which will vest within 60 days of March 1, 2019. |
| |
(3) | Consists of (i) 210,892 shares held of record by Mr. Komin, (ii) 969,543 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding stock options held by Mr. Komin which are exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2019, and (iii) 42,188 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which will vest within 60 days of March 1, 2019. |
| |
(4) | Consists of (i) 43,164 shares held of record by Mr. Dawson, (ii) 166,666 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding stock options held by Mr. Dawson which are exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2019, and (iii) 15,625 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which will vest within 60 days of March 1, 2019. |
| |
(5) | Consists of (i) 17,279 shares held of record by Ms. Steele, (ii) 32,187 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding stock options held by Ms. Steele which are exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2019, and (iii) 6,575 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which will vest within 60 days of March 1, 2019. |
| |
(6) | Consists of (i) 60,000 shares held of record by deWilde Family Trust, for which Ms. August-deWilde and her spouse serve as co-trustees, and (ii) 54,935 shares held directly by Ms. August-deWilde. |
| |
(7) | Consists of (i) 20,571 shares held of record by the Dach Dickie Family Trust, (ii) 62,899 shares held directly by Mr. Dach, and (iii) 100,000 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding stock options held by Mr. Dach which are exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2019. |
| |
(8) | Consists of 15,101 shares held of record by Mr. Ferber. |
| |
(9) | Consists of 15,101 shares held of record by Ms. Powell. |
| |
(10) | Consists of (i) 495,054 shares held of record by the Risk Family Trust dated June 23, 2006, for which Mr. Risk and his spouse serve as co-trustees, (ii) 49,641 shares held directly by Mr. Risk, and (iii) 120,000 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding stock options held by Mr. Risk which are exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2019. |
| |
(11) | (2)Consists of (i) 1,442,971 shares held of record by Mr. Fenster, (ii) 1,654,091 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding stock options held by Mr. Fenster which are exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2021, and (iii) 43,004 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which will vest within 60 days of March 1, 2021. (3)Mr. vonReichbauer joined the Company in May 2020. (4)Consists of (i) 74,905 shares held of record by a trust for the benefit of Mr. Dawson and his family, (ii) 6,852 shares held of record by Mr. Dawson, (iii) 167,507 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding stock options held by Mr. Dawson which are exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2021, and (iv) 29,337 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which will vest within 60 days of March 1, 2021. (5)Consists of 100,875 shares held of record by a trust for the benefit of Ms. August-deWilde and her family. (6)Consists of (i) 20,571 shares held of record by a trust for the benefit of Mr. Dach and his family, (ii) 69,948 shares held directly by Mr. Dach, and (iii) 50,000 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding stock options held by Mr. Dach which are exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2021. (7)Consists of 23,940 shares held of record by Mr. Ferber. (8)Consists of 39,041 shares held of record by Ms. Powell. (9)Consists of (i) 267,569 shares held of record by a trust for the benefit of Mr. Risk and his family, (ii) 73,581 shares held directly by Mr. Risk, and (iii) 120,000 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding stock options held by Mr. Risk which are exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2021. (10)Consists of (i) 95,565 shares held of record by Mr. Bywater, (ii) 313,371 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding stock options held by Mr. Bywater which are exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2021, and (iii) 192,554 shares issuable pursuant to RSUs which will vest within 60 days of March 1, 2021. (11)Consists of 4,050 shares held of record by Ms. Smith. (12)Consists of (i) 5,060,193 shares held of record, (ii) 3,706,792 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding stock options which are exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2021, and (iii) 343,300 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding RSUs which will vest within 60 days of March 1, 2021. (13)As of December 31, 2020, the reporting date of the most recent filing with the SEC by entities affiliated with Fidelity Management & Research Company (“FMR LLC”) pursuant to Section 13(g) of the Exchange Act filed on February 5, 2021, FMR LLC has sole voting power with respect to 9,889,360 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 29,629,547 shares. Members of the Johnson family, including Abigail P. Johnson (a director, the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer of FMR LLC), are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of Series B voting common shares of FMR LLC, representing 49% of the voting power of FMR LLC.Consists of (i) 206,097 shares held of record by the Vassallo Family Revocable Trust dated July 15, 2002, for which Mr. Vassallo serves as trustee, and (ii) 30,703 shares held directly by Mr. Vassallo. Mr. Vassallo is a director of the Company and a managing member of Foundation Capital Management Co. VI, L.L.C. The address for Foundation Capital is 555 High Street, 3rd Floor, Palo Alto, CA 94301. |
| |
(12) | Consists of (i) 738,723 shares held of record by Mr. Winnowski, and (ii) 726,728 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding stock options held by Mr. Winnowski which are fully vested and immediately exercisable as of when Mr. Winnowski’s employment ceased on April 1, 2018. |
| |
(13) | Consists of (i) 5,452,303 shares held of record, (ii) 4,968,950 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding stock options which are exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2019, and (iii) 236,436 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding RSUs which will vest within 60 days of March 1, 2019. |
| |
(14) | As of December 31, 2018, the reporting date of the most recent filing with the SEC by entities affiliated with Tiger Global Management, LLC (“Tiger Global”) pursuant to Section 13(g) of the Exchange Act filed on February 14, 2019, Tiger Global has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 17,817,199 shares. The reported amount of securities beneficially owned includes the securities beneficially owned by advisory clients of Tiger Global and/or its related persons and may be deemed to be beneficially owned by (i) Tiger Global, (ii) Charles P. Coleman, III ("Coleman"), a partner and portfolio manager of Tiger Global, and (iii) Scott Shleifer ("Shleifer"), a partner and portfolio manager of Tiger Global. Each of Tiger Global, Coleman and Shleifer disclaim beneficial ownership of the reported securities except to the extent of his or its pecuniary interest therein, and affirmatively disclaim being a "group" for purposes of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). The address for Tiger Global is 9 West 57th Street, 35th Floor, New York, NY 10019.
|
| |
(15) | As of December 31, 2018, the reporting date of the most recent filing with the SEC by entities affiliated with Fidelity Management & Research Company (“FMR LLC”) pursuant to Section 13(g) of the Exchange Act filed on February 13, 2019, FMR LLC has sole voting power with respect to 2,662,700 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 16,777,863 shares, Abigail P. Johnson has sole dispositive power with respect to 16,777,863 shares; and Fidelity Balanced Fund has sole voting power with respect to 10,106,501 shares. Members of the Johnson family, including Abigail P. Johnson (a director, the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer of FMR LLC), are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of Series B voting common shares of FMR LLC, representing 49% of the voting power of FMR LLC. The Johnson family group and all other Series B shareholders have entered into a shareholders’ voting agreement under which all Series B voting common shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Series B voting common shares. Accordingly, through their ownership of voting common shares and the execution of the shareholders’ voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”), to form a controlling group with respect to FMR LLC. Neither FMR LLC nor Abigail P. Johnson has the sole power to vote or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the various investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act (“Fidelity Funds”) advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC (“FMR Co LLC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of FMR LLC, which power resides with the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees. FMR Co LLC carries out the voting of the shares under written guidelines established by the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees. The reported amount of securities beneficially owned includes the securities beneficially owned, or that may be deemed to be beneficially owned, by FMR LLC, certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates, and other companies (collectively the “FMR Reporters”).The reported amount of securities beneficially owned by the FMR Reporters does not include securities, if any, beneficially owned by certain other companies whose beneficial ownership of securities is disaggregated from that of the FMR Reporters in accordance with the majority vote of Series B voting common shares. Accordingly, through their ownership of voting common shares and the execution of the shareholders’ voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”), to form a controlling group with respect to FMR LLC. Neither FMR LLC nor Abigail P. Johnson has the sole power to vote or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the various investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act (“Fidelity Funds”) advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company (“FMR Co”), a wholly owned subsidiary of FMR LLC, which power resides with the Fidelity Funds' Boards of Trustees. Fidelity Management & Research Company carries out the voting of the shares under written guidelines established by the Fidelity Funds' Boards of Trustees. The reported amount of securities beneficially owned includes the securities beneficially owned, or that may be deemed to be beneficially owned, by FMR LLC, certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates, and other companies (collectively the “FMR Reporters”). The reported amount of securities beneficially owned by the FMR Reporters does not include securities, if any, beneficially owned by certain other companies whose beneficial ownership of securities is disaggregated from that of the FMR Reporters in accordance |
with Securities and Exchange Commission Release No. 34-39538 (January 12, 1998).The address for FMR LLC is 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210.
| |
(16) | As of December 31, 2018, the reporting date of the most recent filing with the SEC by entities affiliated with The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”) pursuant to Section 13(g) of the Exchange Act filed on February 13, 2019, Vanguard has sole voting power with respect to 91,674 shares, shared voting power with respect to 5,100 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 7,909,718 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 85,495 shares. The address for Vanguard is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355. |
| |
(17) | As of December 31, 2015, the reporting date of the most recent filing with the SEC by entities affiliated with Sequoia Capital pursuant to Section 13(g) of the Exchange Act filed on February 12, 2016, Sequoia Capital U.S. Growth Fund IV, L.P. (“SCGF IV”) has shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 7,204,719 shares, Sequoia Capital USGF Principals Fund IV, L.P. (“SCGF IV PF”) has shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 313,241 shares, SCGF IV Management, L.P. (“SCGF IV MGMT”) has shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 7,517,960 shares, of which 7,204,719 shares are directly held by SCGF IV and 313,241 shares are directly held by SCGF IV PF, and SC US (TTGP), LTD (“US TTGP”) has shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 7,517,960 shares, of which 7,204,719 shares are directly held by SCGF IV and 313,241 shares are directly held by SCGF IV PF. SCGF IV MGMT is the General Partner of each of SCGF IV and SCGF IV PF, and TTGP is the General Partner of SCGF IV MGMT. The address for Sequoia Capital is 2800 Sand Hill Road, Suite 101, Menlo Park, CA 94025. |
| |
(18) | As of December 31, 2018, the reporting date of the most recent filing with the SEC by entities affiliated with BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) pursuant to Section 13(g) of the Exchange Act filed on February 6, 2019, BlackRock has sole voting power with respect to 6,515,352 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 6,725,927 shares. The address for BlackRock is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.
|
(14)This information is as of December 31, 2020 and is based solely on information contained in the Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 27, 2021. As of January 27, 2021, the reporting date of the most recent filing with the SEC by entities affiliated with BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”), BlackRock has sole voting power with respect to 23,136,420 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 23,631,994 shares. The address for BlackRock is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.
(15)This information is as of December 31, 2020 and is based solely on information contained in the Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021. As of February 16, 2021, the reporting date of the most recent filing with the SEC by entities affiliated with Coatue Management, L.L.C. and Coatue Offshore Master Fund LP (“Coatue”), Coatue Management, L.L.C. has shared dispositive power with respect to 18,692,965 shares and Coatue Offshore Master Fund LP has shared voting power with respect to 13,028,249 shares and shared dispositive power over 13,028,249 shares (these shares include shares owned by an entity that is wholly owned by Coatue Offshore Master Fund LP over which Coatue Management, L.L.C. has beneficial ownership), and Philippe Laffont (“Laffont”), the managing member of Coatue, has shared voting power with respect to 18,692,965 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 18,692,965 shares. The address for Coatue is 9 West 57th Street, New York, New York 10019.
(16)This information is as of December 31, 2020, and is based solely on information contained in the Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2021. As of February 10, 2021, the reporting date of the most recent filing with the SEC by entities affiliated with The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”), Vanguard has shared voting power with respect to 362,677 shares,sole dispositive power with respect to 16,168,255 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 471,534 shares. The address for Vanguard is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.
RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS
We had no transactions or series of similar transactions, since the beginning of our last fiscal year, and none are currently proposed, to which we were a party or will be a party, in which:
the amounts involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000; and
any of our directors, nominees for director, executive officers or beneficial holders of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, or any immediate family member of, or person sharing the household with, any of these individuals or entities (each, a related person), had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Policies and Procedures for Related Party Transactions
Our audit committee has the primary responsibility for reviewing and approving transactions with related persons. Our audit committee charter provides that our audit committee shall review and approve in advance any related person transactions. Our board of directors has adopted a formal written policy providing that we are not permitted to enter into any transaction that exceeds $120,000 and in which any related person has a direct or indirect material interest without the consent of our audit committee. In approving or rejecting any such transaction, our audit committee is to consider the relevant facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant to our audit committee, including whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction.
Since the beginning of our last fiscal year, and none are currently proposed, to which we were a party or will be a party, in which:
•the amounts involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000; and
•any of our directors, nominees for director, executive officers or beneficial holders of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, or any immediate family member of, or person sharing the household with, any of these individuals or entities (each, a related person), had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
HOUSEHOLDING OF ANNUAL MEETING MATERIALS
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (such as banks and brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy materials with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single copy of the proxy statement, Annual Report on Form 10-K or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, as applicable, addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies. This year, a number of brokers with account holders who are our stockholders will be householding our proxy materials. A single Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the impacted stockholders. Once you have received notice from us (if you are a stockholder of record) or from your broker (if you are a beneficial owner) that we or they will be “householding” communications to your address, “householding” will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in “householding” and would prefer to receive a separate proxy materials, including the Notice, or if you currently receive multiple copies and would like to request “householding” of your communications, please notify your broker or us. Direct your written request to us to the Sunrun Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, 595 Market225 Bush Street, 29th Floor,Suite 1400, San Francisco, CA 9410594104 or by telephone at (415) 510-4833. In the event a stockholder that received multiple copies would like to receive only one copy for such stockholder’s household, such stockholder should contact their bank, broker, or other nominee record holder, or contact us at the above address or phone number.
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEREPORTS
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders file reports of ownership and changes of ownership with the SEC.Such directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
SEC regulations require us to identify in this proxy statement anyone who filed a required report late during the most recent fiscal year.Based solely on our review of forms we received and written representations of our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders, we believe that during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2020, all Section 16(a) filing requirements were satisfied on a timely basis.
OTHER MATTERS
Fiscal Year 20182020 Annual Report and SEC Filings
Our financial statements for our fiscal year ended December 31, 20182020 are included in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K, which we will make available to stockholders at the same time as this proxy statement. This proxy statement and our annual report are posted on our website at www.sunrun.com under “Investors – Corporate Governance”Filings & Financials” and are available from the SEC at its website at www.sec.gov. You may also obtain a copy of our annual report without charge by sending a written request to Sunrun Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, 595 Market225 Bush Street, 29th Floor,Suite 1400, San Francisco, California 94105.94104.
* * *
The board of directors does not know of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any additional matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the enclosed proxy card will have discretion to vote the shares of our common stock they represent in accordance with their own judgment on such matters.
It is important that your shares of our common stock be represented at the Annual Meeting, regardless of the number of shares that you hold. You are, therefore, urged to vote by telephone or by using the Internet as instructed on the enclosed proxy card or execute and return, at your earliest convenience, the enclosed proxy card in the envelope that has also been provided.
|
| |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
|
San Francisco, California |
April 18, 201921, 2021 |